Tranny's, SJWs, male feminists - Imagine my shock!

Shitpost about Trump, SJWs, Islam and everything else about politics except economics, because that's too hard
User avatar
VoiceOfReasonPast
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 54817
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Tranny's, SJWs, male feminists - Imagine my shock!

Post by VoiceOfReasonPast » Fri Jul 04, 2025 12:43 pm

Le Redditeur wrote:
Fri Jul 04, 2025 12:21 pm
Nobody wants to look at trannies.
Depends on what's happening to them (in Minecraft)...
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly

4 wikia: static -> vignette

User avatar
Lindsay's Liver
Resident Boomer
Posts: 3143
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 11:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Tranny's, SJWs, male feminists - Imagine my shock!

Post by Lindsay's Liver » Sat Jul 05, 2025 3:22 pm

In boxing, opponents are matched by weight class. This makes the sport more competitive and interesting and no one ever questions it. I haven't seen a single liberal argue that it's oppressive that we don't have 130 lb. men boxing 250 lb. men.

We have to do something like that in other sports now, apparently. Because matching opponents by how they FEEL about themselves, rather than their physicality, is retarded.

The solution, if the culture decides to keep playing along with this idiocy, is to simply re-label everything. Take the gendered words out. Stop calling it "men's swimming" and "women's swimming" and call them something else. Some dry scientific terms for body type and muscle mass. What? I don't know. I never did well in science class.

User avatar
rabidtictac
Posts: 22407
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Tranny's, SJWs, male feminists - Imagine my shock!

Post by rabidtictac » Sun Jul 06, 2025 9:04 am

Lindsay's Liver wrote:
Sat Jul 05, 2025 3:22 pm
In boxing, opponents are matched by weight class. This makes the sport more competitive and interesting and no one ever questions it. I haven't seen a single liberal argue that it's oppressive that we don't have 130 lb. men boxing 250 lb. men.

We have to do something like that in other sports now, apparently. Because matching opponents by how they FEEL about themselves, rather than their physicality, is retarded.

The solution, if the culture decides to keep playing along with this idiocy, is to simply re-label everything. Take the gendered words out. Stop calling it "men's swimming" and "women's swimming" and call them something else. Some dry scientific terms for body type and muscle mass. What? I don't know. I never did well in science class.
I've made this exact argument before. Now, there is one flaw with it, which is that men and women of the exact same weight have different amounts of muscle mass generally. So even if you put a 180lb man vs a 180lb woman, assuming approximate levels of physical fitness, the man will have more muscle mass, be stronger and probably display greater stamina.

But at least that would be more fair than the situation we are in now. I actually have nothing against a woman competing against a man in any sport. It's usually the women who have a problem with it.

https://www.espn.com/mma/story/_/id/321 ... -mma-debut

I mean, who doesn't want to watch a man beat up a bunch of women in a ring?
RAPEMAN wrote:
Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:42 pm
>liberal: ban x
>trump: yeah ban x
>liberal: no bro x is awesome

User avatar
RAPEMAN
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 12421
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:22 pm
Contact:

Re: Tranny's, SJWs, male feminists - Imagine my shock!

Post by RAPEMAN » Sat Jul 12, 2025 9:01 pm



French courts find that Macron's wife IS a man.
And we are further reminded that Piers is a fag.
SpoilerShow
EVERY POST I HAVE EVER MADE HERE IS SATIRE. I DO NOT CONDONE NOR SUPPORT ANY OF THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED ON THIS FORUM.

User avatar
Lindsay's Liver
Resident Boomer
Posts: 3143
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 11:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Tranny's, SJWs, male feminists - Imagine my shock!

Post by Lindsay's Liver » Mon Jul 14, 2025 7:56 pm

It's gotten back to me that my troon co-worker thinks that I don't like him.

I don't, but I thought I was hiding it better.

User avatar
VoiceOfReasonPast
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 54817
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Tranny's, SJWs, male feminists - Imagine my shock!

Post by VoiceOfReasonPast » Mon Jul 14, 2025 8:01 pm

You're a straight(?) cishet, so it's only natural for him to assume it.
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly

4 wikia: static -> vignette

User avatar
rabidtictac
Posts: 22407
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Tranny's, SJWs, male feminists - Imagine my shock!

Post by rabidtictac » Mon Jul 14, 2025 10:40 pm

You can't really hide liking or disliking someone.
RAPEMAN wrote:
Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:42 pm
>liberal: ban x
>trump: yeah ban x
>liberal: no bro x is awesome

User avatar
VoiceOfReasonPast
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 54817
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Tranny's, SJWs, male feminists - Imagine my shock!

Post by VoiceOfReasonPast » Mon Jul 14, 2025 10:41 pm

Me every time I see a dude with a skirt:
Image
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly

4 wikia: static -> vignette

User avatar
RAPEMAN
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 12421
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:22 pm
Contact:

Re: Tranny's, SJWs, male feminists - Imagine my shock!

Post by RAPEMAN » Tue Jul 15, 2025 12:32 am

VoiceOfReasonPast wrote:
Mon Jul 14, 2025 10:41 pm
Me every time I see a dude with a shirt:
Image
Fixed that for you.
SpoilerShow
EVERY POST I HAVE EVER MADE HERE IS SATIRE. I DO NOT CONDONE NOR SUPPORT ANY OF THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED ON THIS FORUM.

User avatar
Lindsay's Liver
Resident Boomer
Posts: 3143
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 11:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Tranny's, SJWs, male feminists - Imagine my shock!

Post by Lindsay's Liver » Tue Jul 15, 2025 1:33 am

rabidtictac wrote:
Mon Jul 14, 2025 10:40 pm
You can't really hide liking or disliking someone.
True, but sometimes the other person is too dumb to notice.

Not so, in this case, I guess!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 252 guests