Tranny's, SJWs, male feminists - Imagine my shock!

Shitpost about Trump, SJWs, Islam and everything else about politics except economics, because that's too hard
User avatar
VoiceOfReasonPast
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 54217
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Tranny's, SJWs, male feminists - Imagine my shock!

Post by VoiceOfReasonPast » Fri Jul 04, 2025 12:43 pm

Le Redditeur wrote:
Fri Jul 04, 2025 12:21 pm
Nobody wants to look at trannies.
Depends on what's happening to them (in Minecraft)...
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly

4 wikia: static -> vignette

User avatar
Lindsay's Liver
Resident Boomer
Posts: 3072
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 11:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Tranny's, SJWs, male feminists - Imagine my shock!

Post by Lindsay's Liver » Sat Jul 05, 2025 3:22 pm

In boxing, opponents are matched by weight class. This makes the sport more competitive and interesting and no one ever questions it. I haven't seen a single liberal argue that it's oppressive that we don't have 130 lb. men boxing 250 lb. men.

We have to do something like that in other sports now, apparently. Because matching opponents by how they FEEL about themselves, rather than their physicality, is retarded.

The solution, if the culture decides to keep playing along with this idiocy, is to simply re-label everything. Take the gendered words out. Stop calling it "men's swimming" and "women's swimming" and call them something else. Some dry scientific terms for body type and muscle mass. What? I don't know. I never did well in science class.

User avatar
rabidtictac
Posts: 22327
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Tranny's, SJWs, male feminists - Imagine my shock!

Post by rabidtictac » Sun Jul 06, 2025 9:04 am

Lindsay's Liver wrote:
Sat Jul 05, 2025 3:22 pm
In boxing, opponents are matched by weight class. This makes the sport more competitive and interesting and no one ever questions it. I haven't seen a single liberal argue that it's oppressive that we don't have 130 lb. men boxing 250 lb. men.

We have to do something like that in other sports now, apparently. Because matching opponents by how they FEEL about themselves, rather than their physicality, is retarded.

The solution, if the culture decides to keep playing along with this idiocy, is to simply re-label everything. Take the gendered words out. Stop calling it "men's swimming" and "women's swimming" and call them something else. Some dry scientific terms for body type and muscle mass. What? I don't know. I never did well in science class.
I've made this exact argument before. Now, there is one flaw with it, which is that men and women of the exact same weight have different amounts of muscle mass generally. So even if you put a 180lb man vs a 180lb woman, assuming approximate levels of physical fitness, the man will have more muscle mass, be stronger and probably display greater stamina.

But at least that would be more fair than the situation we are in now. I actually have nothing against a woman competing against a man in any sport. It's usually the women who have a problem with it.

https://www.espn.com/mma/story/_/id/321 ... -mma-debut

I mean, who doesn't want to watch a man beat up a bunch of women in a ring?
RAPEMAN wrote:
Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:42 pm
>liberal: ban x
>trump: yeah ban x
>liberal: no bro x is awesome

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests