Feminism and SJW's in general

Shitpost about Trump, SJWs, Islam and everything else about politics except economics, because that's too hard
Post Reply
User avatar
Lindsay's Liver
Resident Boomer
Posts: 3158
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 11:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Feminism and SJW's in general

Post by Lindsay's Liver » Sat May 07, 2022 4:40 am

Abortion is one of those complicated issues for me.

My gut reaction:
I hate it. It should be illegal. "Muh body, muh choice" is a non-argument because I'm concerned about the seperate human that's growing inside of a woman. I have zero interest in controlling some idiot's body, despite how much they say that I do.

My rational reaction:
Bitches are gonna have abortions no matter what. Even if they're illegal everywhere. They can still do it. So outlawing them is a big nothing.

My other rational reaction:
Third-trimester abortions are fucked up and I don't like anyone who's in favor of them.

My observational reaction:
Texas imposed some of the strictest abortion laws in the country last year (it's illegal after six weeks) and I haven't seen any rioting in the streets over it and our Republican governor towers over his Democrat challenger in the polls.

Anyway, Savannah Hernandez is a pretty, little, right-wing brown girl who gets great quotes from horrible people because she's so non-threatening. Her latest video polling freaks on the boardwalk in Venice Beach, CA about Roe v. Wade is full of insanity.


User avatar
ebin namefag
Officer
Posts: 4556
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2021 6:06 am
Contact:

Re: Feminism and SJW's in general

Post by ebin namefag » Sat May 07, 2022 7:38 am

Lindsay's Liver wrote:
Sat May 07, 2022 4:40 am
Anyway, Savannah Hernandez is a pretty, little, right-wing brown girl
Is there anything you won't jack to?
rabidtictac wrote:
Sun Jul 03, 2022 7:49 am
The secret is to stop thinking.
Uguuboi wrote:
Mon Apr 29, 2024 8:13 pm
Your parents are disgusted and ashamed of you

User avatar
VoiceOfReasonPast
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 54915
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Feminism and SJW's in general

Post by VoiceOfReasonPast » Sat May 07, 2022 7:47 am

rabidtictac wrote:
Sat May 07, 2022 2:30 am
Of course, one can say "just get a vasectomy." Because it's a much easier operation than the female equivalent. But that's rather more permanent. Maybe the man does want to have children someday, or at least the option to have children. Men remaining able to bear kids for much longer than women, typically. So a man may not want to make a decision at age 22 that stays with him until he dies at age 84 or whatever. That's a long time and people change a lot. Women generally can't have kids past 40-50. Not safely anyway. So a man can have children for about twice as long as a woman. It strikes me as somewhat cavalier to ask the man to shoulder the burden of lifelong infertility when he has so much longer to live with it. A woman's infertility arrives naturally around the halfway point of life.

There may be options to reverse vasectomies, but I couldn't say how well any of that shit works. A quick google search shows a 75% success rate if you have it reversed within three motherfucking years. So you better change your mind fucking fast. :lol: Otherwise that success rate tanks.
Have you lived under a rock? Irresponsible and irreversible operations done on a whim are all the rage these days.
Lindsay's Liver wrote:
Sat May 07, 2022 4:40 am
My observational reaction:
Texas imposed some of the strictest abortion laws in the country last year (it's illegal after six weeks) and I haven't seen any rioting in the streets over it and our Republican governor towers over his Democrat challenger in the polls.
If they riot this time, they'll mostly do it due to hurt feefees.
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly

4 wikia: static -> vignette

McGinnis
Posts: 2689
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2022 7:02 am
Contact:

Re: Feminism and SJW's in general

Post by McGinnis » Sat May 07, 2022 10:24 am

rabidtictac wrote:
Sat May 07, 2022 2:30 am
I'm not anti abortion btw. I'm pro because people suck ass. I'd rather they all be going around aborting than bringing up kids they don't want to have and abusing the shit out of them, or sticking them in the revolving door of foster homes until they come out career criminals on the other end.
I lean pro, but easy access to abortion doesn't stop most shitty people from raising a bunch of shitty kids.

User avatar
VoiceOfReasonPast
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 54915
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Feminism and SJW's in general

Post by VoiceOfReasonPast » Sat May 07, 2022 10:40 am

I am for mandatory abortions for anyone using social media.
I am also for legal abortions until the child moves into its own apartment.
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly

4 wikia: static -> vignette

User avatar
Kugelfisch
Gesichert Rechtsradikal
Posts: 51245
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:36 pm
Contact:

Re: Feminism and SJW's in general

Post by Kugelfisch » Sat May 07, 2022 11:46 am

I'm pro euthanasia and think the world could stand to lose a good two thirds of its human population. Mostly Chinese and Indians. So I'm not the best guy to ask about abortions.

However, that it's such a big deal to western whores, despite about two dozen contraceptives for women to use that would prevent a pregnancy in the first place readily available, makes it seem like an issue of a lack of foresight, poor impulse control and degeneracy.
So I say ban it. Force them to use the contraceptives or go with shady alternative abortions likely to end deadly. They deserve it.
>muh rape
Carry a gun. Don't get raped or die trying.
SpoilerShow
Image
Stolzmonat > White Boy Summer

User avatar
Lindsay's Liver
Resident Boomer
Posts: 3158
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 11:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Feminism and SJW's in general

Post by Lindsay's Liver » Sun May 08, 2022 1:51 am

Some of muh liberal friends are reservedly starting to badmouth Ruth Bader Ginsburg for not retiring in time for Obama to appoint her replacement. Coulda saved Roe v Wade!!

From a Facebook discussion:
Honestly, we would be better off if RBG retired when Obama asked her. No one on the left wants to discuss that, though.
You are right. It's a prime example of how we don't play to win. Hillary should have campaigned in Michigan instead of coasting. Bernie should have more vocal about his support and the fact that he knew he was being used in an op. Too many wrong assumptions.
it was absolute horrible decision from RBG. no one took trump seriously, at all levels, all the "I'm voting third party because Hilary will win and I dont really like her either"

its like the dems want to play everything honorably so we dont hurt anyones feelings. GOP play to win at all costs and at all levels, no matter how dirty.
I've said this before, but I refuse the blackpill because every liberal I know is a blackpill addict.

User avatar
RedLine
Posts: 4221
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2018 3:47 am
Contact:

Re: Feminism and SJW's in general

Post by RedLine » Sun May 08, 2022 2:12 am

its like the dems want to play everything honorably

User avatar
Pope Corky III
Posts: 1390
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 7:11 pm
Contact:

Re: Feminism and SJW's in general

Post by Pope Corky III » Sun May 08, 2022 3:56 am

Lindsay's Liver wrote:
Sun May 08, 2022 1:51 am
Some of muh liberal friends are reservedly starting to badmouth Ruth Bader Ginsburg for not retiring in time for Obama to appoint her replacement. Coulda saved Roe v Wade!!
There is truth to "RBG should have retired" but who's to say that depending on when she retired Mitch McConnell wouldn't have refused to confirm a Supreme Court Justice towards the end of Obama's Presidency just like what happened with Scalia? Let's not bullshit each other here, Merrick Garland should have been a Supreme Court justice for the past 5 years, not Gorsuch. That's a huge, legitimate reason why the leftists want to go Civil War 2 Marvel Phase 4 right now. I don't care what Garland did to the Unibomber or whoever the fuck it was, Garland should be on the Supreme Court (shit I'd rather have him there than the pedo-defender). Not to mention McConnell pulled the same inverse tactic when Ginsberg did die and then Cunty Coney got greased in. The more I think about it the more I want the left to pack the court with liberal justices at this point.

All this shit is entirely Mitch McConnell's fault. And if there are any riots because of Roe V Wade, it will be on his hands. That subhuman mongrel should have been Epstein'd a long time ago. I honestly think Coney and Gorsuch should be removed from the court just because of the underhanded tactics McConnell used to get them in. Ironically Kavanaugh is the only Trump justice I consider legit.
da PAC Nigguh wrote:
Wed Mar 25, 2020 4:14 pm
He may have caught it at the same Bilderberg-Illuminati meeting as Prince Albert in a Can. I guess lizardmen aren't immune.

McGinnis
Posts: 2689
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2022 7:02 am
Contact:

Re: Feminism and SJW's in general

Post by McGinnis » Sun May 08, 2022 4:04 am

Pope Corky III wrote:
Sun May 08, 2022 3:56 am
Merrick Garland should have been a Supreme Court justice for the past 5 years, not Gorsuch
Merrick Garland is an immensely corrupt, immensely incompetent idiot and if Cocaine did one thing right, it was denying that twat a seat on the Supreme Court

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 167 guests