NCunt: Black Cocks Only

[Kugelfisch]

Morons like NChick, Dave Willis, and IDW have forgotten that these are toys for children and insist that they must cater to the whims of adult women (and betas).

They actually believe children should be accustomed to this degenerative debauchery. Cucknadia teaches this shit in school.

Sure, best to be molested explore their sexuality from an early age with the guidance of a pedophile sex pervert trustworthy adult as our green party suggested and campaigned for by advocating for pedophilia being made legal.
They've had lots of instances of fucking minors consenting erotic relationships in the 70s with children young adults in their party so I'll trust them to have superior knowledge above me in that field.

Love should never be illegal, you guys!

[rabidtictac]

Meanwhile, affirmative consent means adult women can't (legally) consent to sex at any point and reserve the right to call it rape later. : D

[RAPEMAN]

Meanwhile, affirmative consent means adult women can't (legally) consent to sex at any point and reserve the right to call it rape later. : D

And they're somehow decisive enough to be trusted behind the voting booth.

[Kugelfisch]

Meanwhile, affirmative consent means adult women can't (legally) consent to sex at any point and reserve the right to call it rape later. : D

So when I'm in the states I may as well just rape either way since it's effectively the same. Got it.

[Liar Revealed]

They actually believe children should be accustomed to this degenerative debauchery. Cucknadia teaches this shit in school.

My state will begin doing so this fall. Maybe we're so retarded because we share a border with Cucknadia.

Oh, and we also encourage trannies to shower with underage girls.

And yes, all this shit happened under Obama.

[rabidtictac]

They actually believe children should be accustomed to this degenerative debauchery. Cucknadia teaches this shit in school.

My state will begin doing so this fall. Maybe we're so retarded because we share a border with Cucknadia.

[AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli]
By:
James Barrett
June 3, 2016

Beginning in fall of 2017, all Washington state public schools will begin teaching kindergartners that gender is a "social construct" and there are "many ways to express gender" as part of its newly-approved "self-identity" curriculum.

One of the "core" areas in Washington state's new health education learning standards is sexual health, components of which will be introduced to children starting in kindergarten, including the idea of gender "self-identity" and the difference between "safe" and "unwanted touch."

The new standards require that kindergartners be taught to understand that "there are many ways to express gender." Gender, as The Daily Caller's Peter Hasson notes, is defined by the state's health education glossary as "a social construct based on emotional, behavioral, and cultural characteristics attached to a person’s assigned biological sex." Gender expression is defined by the state as "the way someone outwardly expresses their gender."

In its "safe" versus "unwanted touch" lessons, the state will teach kindgartners to "[r]ecognize people have the right to refuse giving or receiving unwanted touch." When TheDC asked Nathan Olson, a communications manager for the state's Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI), if that meant they were teaching kindergartners about the idea of consent, they got no response.

In third grade, children will learn that they should respect others' self-determined "gender identity," an idea that will be elaborated on in fourth grade, when they will be taught to identify "how friends and family can influence ideas regarding gender roles, identity, and expression," along with lessons on HIV prevention. In fifth grade, children will be taught about the ways "media, society, and culture" influence the "social construct" of gender and how to "identify trusted adults to ask questions about gender identity and sexual orientation." In seventh grade, students will be asked to distinguish "between biological sex, gender identity, gender expression, and sexual orientation."

Purge SoCal already. Drop a nuke right on San Fran.

[RAPEMAN]

I've always said Norcal and SoCal should separate because they are essentially two different states ideologically already, but then I remember SoCal would fight to the death because they would essentially be giving the Republicans another Red State.

[Poonoo]

I've always said Norcal and SoCal should separate because they are essentially two different states ideologically already

San Francisco is in Northern California, are you sure about that?

[Osterzone]

What? Bay Area is just as blue.

Beaten by Poonoo.

[RAPEMAN]

I've always said Norcal and SoCal should separate because they are essentially two different states ideologically already

San Francisco is in Northern California, are you sure about that?

I'm confident all the spics will go back south when the surrounding bush areas start voting red.