
Mathew "Film Bald" Buck
- VoiceOfReasonPast
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 54915
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mathew "Film Bald" Buck

Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
- Some Sick Fuck
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 5308
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 7:10 am
- Contact:
Re: Mathew "Film Bald" Buck
Briefly checking on this guy reminded me how easy it is to instantly despise him. This is the peak beta cuck. Barely thirty, looks and acts like an angry old man. Is afraid of woman, and secretly hates them, which he tries to balance with being a good ally. Constantly frustrated with his worthless existence, living in his parent's basement, he oozes failure. A true waste of space, and deep down, he knows it, that's why he's so angry and frustrated all the time.
A "legitimate" movie critic. I would rather see him become a legitimate fertilizer, but even with his rapid aging, I'm afraid it's going to take few decades.
A "legitimate" movie critic. I would rather see him become a legitimate fertilizer, but even with his rapid aging, I'm afraid it's going to take few decades.

Blessed are the shitposters, for they will be called children of the Sperg.
- Kugelfisch
- Gesichert Rechtsradikal
- Posts: 51240
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mathew "Film Bald" Buck
He'll be around for a while. But his future is bleak. He will inherit the house but I doubt he can afford to keep it. He has managed to hit 30 without any skills whatsoever. He's not even fit for dumb labour, since he obviously couldn't hold a shovel for over ten minutes.
"Failure" describes him perfectly.
"Failure" describes him perfectly.
SpoilerShow

-
- Posts: 824
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 11:55 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mathew "Film Bald" Buck
It's a Hell of his own creation. He can rail on "trolls" or the evil Algorithm all he wants, but his video quality and presentation skills are stuck in 2009 and nobody cares about his mid-tier taste in the same blockbusters everyone else is reviewing.
- VoiceOfReasonPast
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 54915
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mathew "Film Bald" Buck
Or some London Film Festival (tm) movie that literally no one cares about.
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
- Kugelfisch
- Gesichert Rechtsradikal
- Posts: 51240
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mathew "Film Bald" Buck
That's already a deep niche but when the "festival" is entirely online due to the coof and you can watch those movies at home, what's the point of a big coverage?
All most people could possibly care about are the few movies that may manage the leap to regular cinema showings. Nobody cares about the faggy art crap.
All most people could possibly care about are the few movies that may manage the leap to regular cinema showings. Nobody cares about the faggy art crap.
SpoilerShow

- Some Sick Fuck
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 5308
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 7:10 am
- Contact:
Re: Mathew "Film Bald" Buck
By the way, something interesting about this twat - he's been doing this for so long and is so terrible at it that he gets very little traffic that isn't already coming from his diehard tranny supporters. I'll just summarize it with him being lazy, useless, ignorant, hideous (while insisting to show his mug constantly), incompetent and thinking that just by cranking out vlog style videos with production values from 2008, he can get any traffic these days, he is his worst enemy.
I've had a try at making a little jewtube channel and to my surprise, it started growing a bit, because I promoted it around and tried doing a gimmick others did not and can't really do. The point is, it's good to see lower retention, because your videos are being shown to audience that's not subscribed to you, that's how you get growth - obviously, if most people just ignore it, that's another problem, but current jewtube is quite good at recommending content to relevant audience.
So if you produce garbage like Mr.Fuck, it's no wonder the system refuses to recommend his videos further, because barely anybody outside of his disgusting circle will click on his trash. Retard has been playing the game for what, 12 years now, and still doesn't know the rules.

Blessed are the shitposters, for they will be called children of the Sperg.
- VoiceOfReasonPast
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 54915
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mathew "Film Bald" Buck
Oh, but he thinks he knows them. He's some kind of Supreme Gentleman of content producers, believing he deserves views for his "hard" ""work"".
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
- ebin namefag
- Officer
- Posts: 4550
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2021 6:06 am
- Contact:
Re: Mathew "Film Bald" Buck
Large anal insertions.Some Sick Fuck wrote: ↑Mon Feb 13, 2023 2:26 pmI've had a try at making a little jewtube channel and to my surprise, it started growing a bit, because I promoted it around and tried doing a gimmick others did not and can't really do.
Your circumference is more blown out than most.
No that's me.
- Kugelfisch
- Gesichert Rechtsradikal
- Posts: 51240
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mathew "Film Bald" Buck
Who would YT recommend the videos to and what would the result be? Which videos would it recommend?
For serious movie critique, you'd expect gainful insight you probably don't have yourself. Or a different viewpoint on a similarly educated basis. Maybe just someone who's opinion you can use as a determination of whether you'd like that movie.
I'm sure most here have some person they watch or read every once in a while for those purposes for music, books, videos and movies or something else.
I don't see Buck the Cuck being that kind of person for anyone.
If you're looking for a dude casually making snarky remarks on shitty movies, he doesn't do that anymore, nor was he even the second or even fifth choice anyone would take.
So if you were the algorithm, what could you possibly promote? I think the above statistics are very reasonable, considering his terrible videos and lack of a target audience.
If anything, those numbers are bloated and point towards his videos getting recommended too often.
For serious movie critique, you'd expect gainful insight you probably don't have yourself. Or a different viewpoint on a similarly educated basis. Maybe just someone who's opinion you can use as a determination of whether you'd like that movie.
I'm sure most here have some person they watch or read every once in a while for those purposes for music, books, videos and movies or something else.
I don't see Buck the Cuck being that kind of person for anyone.
If you're looking for a dude casually making snarky remarks on shitty movies, he doesn't do that anymore, nor was he even the second or even fifth choice anyone would take.
So if you were the algorithm, what could you possibly promote? I think the above statistics are very reasonable, considering his terrible videos and lack of a target audience.
If anything, those numbers are bloated and point towards his videos getting recommended too often.
SpoilerShow

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 376 guests