Collapse of the West (Purge General Thread)

[VoiceOfReasonPast]

Try something like "porsh-uh".

[Guest]

BMW

[rabidtictac]

Porch is the only pronunciation a true burgerican accepts.

[Guest]

Every once in a while a farmer has a decent thought:

Holding progressives to the same standard they hold others is a lose lose proposition and a failure to understand the game they play.

Progressives work out of Saul Alinsky's play book Rules for Radicals (RULE 4: "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.") which promotes the idea of holding others to rules and standards while ignoring them and refusing to acknowledge the hypocrisy. Weaponizing a lack of integrity. Being disturbed by this behavior is like being disturbed that a rabbit abandons it's young when confronted by a predator.

It's in their nature.

The reason post-modernists, communists and progressives raise Hell when they see an enemy breaking the rules but do nothing when they see their own doing the same is because they don't see the rules as a means to maintain order but as a weapon to be used only against an enemy.

The only reason that fellow progressives like Ellis get held to account for breaking orthodoxy is because they are seen as enemies by other progressives or have lost their value in advancing the agenda and are thus only useful as food to be cannibalized. They don't care if Ellis hurt anyone any more than they care if Zach hurt anyone. What they care about is if what Zach or Ellis did can be used. If Ellis was seen as useful as a member of the cause again he'd be forgiven and welcomed back but he's more useful as a pariah.

Forgiveness also depends on utility. Is James Gunn's prestige as a director usefull? Yes=forgiveness. No=Mel Gibson. Gina is evil but Pedro is a saint. Trump said "they'll let you grab em by the pussy" and he's Satan. Hillary called black boys "super-predators" fit for mass incarceration and destroyed Bill's rape victims and she's a champion of minority and women's rights.

They don't believe in the rules. They believe in the directed exercise of power. Integrity and consistency are seen as weaknesses to be exploited. This is why they wait so long when one of their own is caught in their own actions. They are doing a calculus to see if protecting them is worthwhile or a lost cause. The "crime" committed is never considered seriously. Only the utility of that person as a member of the in group versus the PR consequences of keeping them.

As outsiders to the group Sciver or Miller or Tennapel are thrown out of the club for the pettiest of excuses while people with genuine utility to the cause like the Weinstein, Ellis or Perez are protected until their utility runs out or protecting them is more expensive than eating them.

The "rules" only apply when they can be used as a cudgel and the reason is rarely because the target broke them.

[VoiceOfReasonPast]

BMW

Be-em-we if you use the "e" from shit like "bet".

[Guest]

a farmer

Yeah, no
Just a like a farmer to write a TL;DR wall of text and pontificate like a faggot to explain what was already patently obvious.

But then, you probably wrote that post, didn't you?

[RAPEMAN]

BMW

Be-em-we if you use the "e" from shit like "bet".

Bee-'em-weh?

[VoiceOfReasonPast]

That "Be" has a short "e". "Bee" and even the English "be" is already too long.

[rabidtictac]

a farmer

Yeah, no
Just a like a farmer to write a TL;DR wall of text and pontificate like a faggot to explain what was already patently obvious.

But then, you probably wrote that post, didn't you?

I was gonna say that it sounds like shit we've already covered here in the past. Nobody is surprised to year that shitlibs value power and control more than morality.

[Guest]

Angry, cocaine filled ranting.

NOW yer speakin my lanuage