He also did nothing right.
INDB 2.0?
- Poonoo
- Bureaucrat
- Posts: 7138
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2017 1:16 pm
- Contact:
- Kugelfisch
- Gesichert Rechtsradikal
- Posts: 51223
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:36 pm
- Contact:
- rabidtictac
- Posts: 22413
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: INDB 2.0?
There are too many good joke responses to that question, Kugel.
But what does any admin do? Mostly he bitched about how DHI was a sperge zone and not Cracked.
But what does any admin do? Mostly he bitched about how DHI was a sperge zone and not Cracked.

- Kugelfisch
- Gesichert Rechtsradikal
- Posts: 51223
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: INDB 2.0?
He certainly didn't help with the crap he made for the site.
SpoilerShow

- Poonoo
- Bureaucrat
- Posts: 7138
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2017 1:16 pm
- Contact:
Re: INDB 2.0?
rabidtictac wrote: ↑Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:05 pmThere are too many good joke responses to that question, Kugel.
But what does any admin do? Mostly he bitched about how DHI was a sperge zone and not Cracked.![]()
This video is mostly Templar reading out one of Monty's sperg posts about how we don't talk about his content when he temporarily banned TGWTG talk, with some potshots at him in there for good measure. I made that picture by the way.
But yeah, he tried to implement tight assed rules on a forum with about 10-20 people posting, that he marketed as a free speech zone. He was somehow surprised that attracting people who like free speech would be pissed at him implementing retarded rules like needed to make a minimum character amount for a post.
- Kugelfisch
- Gesichert Rechtsradikal
- Posts: 51223
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: INDB 2.0?
Oh god, I remember shit like that. "We already talked about that!" bullshit everywhere. The notion that DHI should be about the DHI content producers who don't do shit for months on end was hilarious.
SpoilerShow

- rabidtictac
- Posts: 22413
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: INDB 2.0?
Even if people posted new "quality content" every single day, nothing posted to DHI could be as interesting as sperging about internet nobodies.
Now if the quality kahntent was ABOUT internet nobody sperge, maybe it could have worked.
Now if the quality kahntent was ABOUT internet nobody sperge, maybe it could have worked.
- Kugelfisch
- Gesichert Rechtsradikal
- Posts: 51223
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: INDB 2.0?
It's funny the site even held it's own for as long as it did. UT uploaded three or so videos in total and Ebeeto wasn't much better.
SpoilerShow

- VoiceOfReasonPast
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 54845
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: INDB 2.0?
Of course! We gotta make our own bullshit instead of Fair-Using someone else'sKugelfisch wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2017 12:57 amOh god, I remember shit like that. "We already talked about that!" bullshit everywhere. The notion that DHI should be about the DHI kahntent producers who don't do shit for months on end was hilarious.

Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
- Kugelfisch
- Gesichert Rechtsradikal
- Posts: 51223
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: INDB 2.0?
He who creates the content controlls the forum.
SpoilerShow

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 212 guests