And Kavanaugh was an assistant to Dubya, what's your point? I have a hard time reconciling anyone on the Supreme Court not being corrupt.McGinnis wrote: ↑Sun May 08, 2022 4:04 amMerrick Garland is an immensely corrupt, immensely incompetent idiot and if Cocaine did one thing right, it was denying that twat a seat on the Supreme CourtPope Corky III wrote: ↑Sun May 08, 2022 3:56 amMerrick Garland should have been a Supreme Court justice for the past 5 years, not Gorsuch
Feminism and SJW's in general
- Pope Corky III
- Posts: 1366
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 7:11 pm
Re: Feminism and SJW's in general
Last edited by Pope Corky III on Sun May 08, 2022 4:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
da PAC Nigguh wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 4:14 pmHe may have caught it at the same Bilderberg-Illuminati meeting as Prince Albert in a Can. I guess lizardmen aren't immune.
Re: Feminism and SJW's in general
The fuck is your point? Democrats wanted Garland on the court, they should have had the numbers. Don't pretend the Democrats wouldn't do, and haven't done, exactly the same thingPope Corky III wrote: ↑Sun May 08, 2022 4:06 amAnd Kavanaugh was an assistant to Dubya, what's your point?
- Moe Bitches
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 5656
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2019 4:54 am
- Location: Hell on Earth
- Contact:
Re: Feminism and SJW's in general
Why did you get rid of Eddie Griffith as a pfp?
da PAC Nigguh wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:06 amShit like this is why satire is dead in currentyear.
Re: Feminism and SJW's in general
If you think Gorsuch is illegitimate then Barret should be fine. A justice died in a presidential election year and they filled the seat.Pope Corky III wrote: ↑Sun May 08, 2022 3:56 amIronically Kavanaugh is the only Trump justice I consider legit.
If you think Barrett is illegitimate then Gorsuch should be fine. A justice died in a presidential election year and they didn't fill the seat until after the election.
Right now you are saying the Republicans should have confirmed Garland in 2016 but kept Ginsburg's seat open in 2020.
What McConnell did was definitely an escalation, but Reid ending the filibuster on other federal judge positions was also an escalation. And, the Republicans were filibustering Obama's judges in the first place because the Democrats were using the filibuster more aggressively than ever before against W. Bush's nominees. Dirty judicial politics goes back decades before that, McConnell is just another domino. If the Democrats stack the Supreme Court (and they might if they get lucky in a few months) the Republicans won't just surrender they'll respond with something bigger when they can.
The best solution would probably be a new amendment but I guess we aren't to that critical mass yet.
- Pope Corky III
- Posts: 1366
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 7:11 pm
Re: Feminism and SJW's in general
Eh, he was there forever and I was tired of looking at him. I still love Mr. Griffin but it was time for a change. I switched him from a quick cut to a head journo who was horrified at another journo who said something on air the elites would have killed them over but I can't remember what it was at all, or the video.
No and no. If Garland replaced Scalia than Barrett replacing Ginsburg would have been fair. But this "all's fair and love and war" mentality McConnell has is bullshit going to cause actual war. The way I see it, yeah the Dems are playing dirty but they're realizing the only way to fight fire at this point is with fire. and what you said about Republicans responding with something bigger is true, which is why I qualified "almost." I also agree that this whole thing started with W. Bush, but that just lends more ammo to the "Bush is the worst thing to happen to America" argument. Trump def also has plenty of ammo against him, but really he himself is just another domino of the Bush effect.RedLine wrote: ↑Sun May 08, 2022 4:48 amIf you think Gorsuch is illegitimate then Barret should be fine. A justice died in a presidential election year and they filled the seat.Pope Corky III wrote: ↑Sun May 08, 2022 3:56 amIronically Kavanaugh is the only Trump justice I consider legit.
If you think Barrett is illegitimate then Gorsuch should be fine. A justice died in a presidential election year and they didn't fill the seat until after the election.
Right now you are saying the Republicans should have confirmed Garland in 2016 but kept Ginsburg's seat open in 2020.
What McConnell did was definitely an escalation, but Reid ending the filibuster on other federal judge positions was also an escalation. And, the Republicans were filibustering Obama's judges in the first place because the Democrats were using the filibuster more aggressively than ever before against W. Bush's nominees. Dirty judicial politics goes back decades before that, McConnell is just another domino. If the Democrats stack the Supreme Court (and they might if they get lucky in a few months) the Republicans won't just surrender they'll respond with something bigger when they can.
The best solution would probably be a new amendment but I guess we aren't to that critical mass yet.
da PAC Nigguh wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 4:14 pmHe may have caught it at the same Bilderberg-Illuminati meeting as Prince Albert in a Can. I guess lizardmen aren't immune.
- VoiceOfReasonPast
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 48112
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
Re: Feminism and SJW's in general
Garland sucks. I don't trust anyone who gets trounced by the Warriors of Light in their first dungeon.
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
- Tony Schiavone
- Posts: 2922
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
Re: Feminism and SJW's in general
Disappointed at the lack of riots today. Current Year Leftists dont have the same stunning and brave convictions they did back in the day.
The one thing this pro-abortion shitheads will never try to answer is the point where actual murder/manslaughter would begin, since that would mean actual human life. By their logic, the abortion defense could set hundreds free because they really dindu nuffin.
The one thing this pro-abortion shitheads will never try to answer is the point where actual murder/manslaughter would begin, since that would mean actual human life. By their logic, the abortion defense could set hundreds free because they really dindu nuffin.
...and still: Spoony did nothing.
- mad bum
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 17989
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 11:15 pm
- Location: In spoony's rape dungeon
Re: Feminism and SJW's in general
If orange man was here they would be in the streets, but they can't make Brandon look bad.Tony Schiavone wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 12:07 amDisappointed at the lack of riots today. Current Year Leftists dont have the same stunning and brave convictions they did back in the day.
SpoilerShow
Re: Feminism and SJW's in general
I'm seeing articles about the decision, but very little "riots are the voice of the unheard" propaganda this time around. The Media isn't going to fuck Uncle Joe lie that, and the cattle can't come up with the idea on their own.Tony Schiavone wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 12:07 amDisappointed at the lack of riots today. Current Year Leftists dont have the same stunning and brave convictions they did back in the day.
The one thing this pro-abortion shitheads will never try to answer is the point where actual murder/manslaughter would begin, since that would mean actual human life. By their logic, the abortion defense could set hundreds free because they really dindu nuffin.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests