Feminism and SJW's in general
- rabidtictac
- Posts: 22170
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:25 pm
Re: Feminism and SJW's in general
The other issue to consider is that if we force poor people to have a lot more kids, then who is going to pay for those kids?
The poor people won't do it because they can't. They can't afford the kids in the first place.
Republicans usually don't want to pay for any social programs of any sort. Will they change their tune when all those accident babies suddenly need food, drink and care? Where will the money come from to raise all these kids, and what will that do to our economy when those kids begin entering the school system and employment? What if all we do is raise a larger criminal underclass?
Democrats favor gibs in all situations. But that isn't the right solution to everything either. Democrat gibs have a way of trapping generations in cycles of poverty due to the way they are dispersed.
You really have to stop and consider the income inequality in the US compared to other countries when looking at all these social issues like abortion. Many of the social issues are not social issues. They're a result of our ridiculously broken infrastructure. These are problems of resource-management. Interview people who don't want kids in America. Ask them why. If those people made 100,000 more annually, would they still not want kids? Or are people evolving a social preference because of practical resource concerns. The USA is also going through an unprecedented housing crisis. Demand for housing far outpaces supply and cheap housing is disappearing rapidly. Most of the cheap property is being purchased by flippers and flipped for 3x what they paid, just because they can.
A person who lives paycheck to paycheck and can barely afford to rent a room or single-bedroom apartment cannot afford to raise children. And those people are not going to just embrace celibacy because some faggot shitposter on the internet tells them they should. That isn't how normies work.
The poor people won't do it because they can't. They can't afford the kids in the first place.
Republicans usually don't want to pay for any social programs of any sort. Will they change their tune when all those accident babies suddenly need food, drink and care? Where will the money come from to raise all these kids, and what will that do to our economy when those kids begin entering the school system and employment? What if all we do is raise a larger criminal underclass?
Democrats favor gibs in all situations. But that isn't the right solution to everything either. Democrat gibs have a way of trapping generations in cycles of poverty due to the way they are dispersed.
You really have to stop and consider the income inequality in the US compared to other countries when looking at all these social issues like abortion. Many of the social issues are not social issues. They're a result of our ridiculously broken infrastructure. These are problems of resource-management. Interview people who don't want kids in America. Ask them why. If those people made 100,000 more annually, would they still not want kids? Or are people evolving a social preference because of practical resource concerns. The USA is also going through an unprecedented housing crisis. Demand for housing far outpaces supply and cheap housing is disappearing rapidly. Most of the cheap property is being purchased by flippers and flipped for 3x what they paid, just because they can.
A person who lives paycheck to paycheck and can barely afford to rent a room or single-bedroom apartment cannot afford to raise children. And those people are not going to just embrace celibacy because some faggot shitposter on the internet tells them they should. That isn't how normies work.
Re: Feminism and SJW's in general
Nobody is asking them to embrace celibacy. Just contraception, which is cheap, easily available and effective.
Also, you're really hung up on it being poor people who are being 'forced' to have children. Let me tell you, poor people often have tons of children that they can't afford to support, and that's with abortion being readily available. It's not poor people who are most affected here. It's rich, affluent, typically white, girls. Abortion procedures cost up to a grand and sometimes a couple grand if it's a late-stage procedure. You really think somebody living paycheck to paycheck can afford that? Easier just to have the kid and give it up for adoption. Or go on welfare, which is what typically happens.
Also, you're really hung up on it being poor people who are being 'forced' to have children. Let me tell you, poor people often have tons of children that they can't afford to support, and that's with abortion being readily available. It's not poor people who are most affected here. It's rich, affluent, typically white, girls. Abortion procedures cost up to a grand and sometimes a couple grand if it's a late-stage procedure. You really think somebody living paycheck to paycheck can afford that? Easier just to have the kid and give it up for adoption. Or go on welfare, which is what typically happens.
- rabidtictac
- Posts: 22170
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:25 pm
Re: Feminism and SJW's in general
I thought abortion being legal meant you could get the state to pay for it. I found a Forbes article reporting in 2016 that 24% of abortions were covered (paid for by taxpayer funding.) Oregon medicaid covers it IIRC.
- Le Redditeur
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 12806
- Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2017 5:58 pm
Re: Feminism and SJW's in general
The Christcucks don't care about any of that. As a matter of fact the Catholic church prefers poverty, they thrive on it and go out of their way to produce economic misery whenever they can. If there are going to be more brown babies being mass dumped into society, even better! Hallelujah for God's little miracles! If they end up becoming violent trash that will burn their precious churches in 20 years or so, it doesn't matter, they'll just blame movies, videogames, or whatever the goddamn Communist child molester they put in charge doesn't like at the time.
- VoiceOfReasonPast
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 53396
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
Re: Feminism and SJW's in general
The Church wants everyone to go back to being a filthy peasant again.
Dude, that's part of their keikaku.rabidtictac wrote: ↑Sat Sep 17, 2022 12:30 amDemocrats favor gibs in all situations. But that isn't the right solution to everything either. Democrat gibs have a way of trapping generations in cycles of poverty due to the way they are dispersed.
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
Re: Feminism and SJW's in general
It really depends on the state, and if you're enrolled in Medicaid. Most states aren't required to provide Medicaid funds for abortion, unless it's one of those rape, incest or threat to mother's life exceptions.rabidtictac wrote: ↑Sat Sep 17, 2022 4:04 amI thought abortion being legal meant you could get the state to pay for it. I found a Forbes article reporting in 2016 that 24% of abortions were covered (paid for by taxpayer funding.) Oregon medicaid covers it IIRC.
Re: Feminism and SJW's in general
Republicans are just pushing this for evangelical voters. This isn't going to get passed and even they know that.
SpoilerShow
EVERY POST I HAVE EVER MADE HERE IS SATIRE. I DO NOT CONDONE NOR SUPPORT ANY OF THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED ON THIS FORUM.
- mad bum
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 18015
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 11:15 pm
- Location: In spoony's rape dungeon
Re: Feminism and SJW's in general
What a dumb move, all this does is rile up the democrats and make them seem like hypocrites going back from the state issue. Even bitch McConnel had to be like "lol we're just kidding
"


SpoilerShow
Re: Feminism and SJW's in general
Oh no Cuckman
Re: Feminism and SJW's in general

SpoilerShow
EVERY POST I HAVE EVER MADE HERE IS SATIRE. I DO NOT CONDONE NOR SUPPORT ANY OF THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED ON THIS FORUM.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests