That's doesn't even matter. The moral and ethical problem is some dude being sexually aroused to imagery depicting children being nude/getting raped.Le Redditeur wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 11:03 pmI think the moral implication is that, for an AI to recognize and generate fake child porn, it needs to be trained on real child porn, which is obviously even more horrifying than even Shadman drawing CP of real children.Complicity wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 3:57 pmFake pictures and drawings are cheese pizza as much as Call of Duty is murder.CuckTurdginson wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 9:08 amIf anything, the fact that AI is making Cheese Pizza more readily accessible
It matters just as little how those images were made -even entirely artificial - as it does that incest has genetic drawbacks or necrophilia is upsetting to the relatives of the deceased.
One naturally despises those people because you know there's something seriously wrong with them and you don't want them to be part of society.
Should drawings be just as illegal? I don't think so. But that's not what the morality is concerned with. Legality and the severity doesn't necessarily correlate. Just like how digging up and fucking a corpse isn't even a felony. The illegality is mild, the morality is extremely reprehensible.
No, they didn't. They tried to tell the story of how Anakin Skywalker became Darth Vader. They just failed miserably and absolutely everyone thought they were shit garbage and the worst Star Wars created at the time.Complicity wrote: ↑Sat Dec 28, 2024 5:56 pmThe only praise that can be given to the prequels is that they at least tried to tell a new storyLe Redditeur wrote: ↑Sat Dec 28, 2024 3:43 pmIt became tres chic in certain circles to defend the prequel slop as a way to stick it up to the Disney slop, as if they aren't all terrible in their own miserable way.