MundaneFatt
- rabidtictac
- Posts: 22434
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: MundaneFatt
He's just a spurdo with no background in anything, no qualifications in anything except overeating, an inflated sense of his own opinion's worth and a massive hardon for shilling shitty merch.
I'm amazed anyone ever listened to this fuck in the first place. But anyway, keep it up Matt, because the only thing that will give Trump another 4 years is if every obnoxious cunt like you spams "I don't care about you if you voted Trump, you are a hateful bigot" maymays until the next election cycle.
I'm amazed anyone ever listened to this fuck in the first place. But anyway, keep it up Matt, because the only thing that will give Trump another 4 years is if every obnoxious cunt like you spams "I don't care about you if you voted Trump, you are a hateful bigot" maymays until the next election cycle.
Re: MundaneFatt
Did anyone seriously not see this coming? Dude has been hard for Anita Sarkeesian since he fucking began.
- asdf
- Posts: 202
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:33 am
- Contact:
Re: MundaneFatt
Him obviously having a crush on Anita Sarkeesian is still the funniest thing to me. How you gonna sit there and yell at a person who does a bad job critiquing video games, then turn right back around and say, "I'm a gamer and I can tell you that there is 100% factually zero difference between playing a game and watching someone else play it."
- Kugelfisch
- Gesichert Rechtsradikal
- Posts: 51258
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: MundaneFatt
Same here. Even in the early days of GG when those e-celebs started to pop up he was considered shit-tier. Even King of /pol/ was regarded as better. MM was always "that clickbait faggot". He's so shit that even the manosphere would consider him retarded.rabidtictac wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2017 11:17 pmI'm amazed anyone ever listened to this fuck in the first place.
But, just like one stumbles over fucking Minecraft channels on YT in [current year]+2 perplexingly still getting thousands of views, even a loser like him gets them views. I can not wait for him to get blacklisted from monetization.
SpoilerShow

- Poonoo
- Bureaucrat
- Posts: 7140
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2017 1:16 pm
- Contact:
Re: MundaneFatt
>MundaneMatt gets viewsKugelfisch wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2017 4:01 pmSame here. Even in the early days of GG when those e-celebs started to pop up he was considered shit-tier. Even King of /pol/ was regarded as better. MM was always "that clickbait faggot". He's so shit that even the manosphere would consider him retarded.rabidtictac wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2017 11:17 pmI'm amazed anyone ever listened to this fuck in the first place.
But, just like one stumbles over fucking Minecraft channels on YT in [current year]+2 perplexingly still getting thousands of views, even a loser like him gets them views. I can not wait for him to get blacklisted from monetization.
https://www.youtube.com/user/MundaneMatt/videos
He has 130K subs yet the fucker is averaging about 5k views per video in the past week. When I look back in the past week his views vary greatly depending on the controversy but he seems to only average 20k views. And you bet your ass he has been hit huge:
https://youtu.be/pDqTPMDUcTE?t=3m28s
While Larry claimed the large ad revenue drop is bullshit, it seems political/drama channels are being hit hard and that H3H3 was being honest. Matt is feeling it already too most likely, and since he only gets $174 a month on Patreon he was reliant solely on youtube ad revenue.
Good fucking riddance. He STILL uploads 3 or 4 videos a fucking day, even TB and other big youtubers seems to acknowledge that once you do more than one video a day you cannibalise your channel.
- Kugelfisch
- Gesichert Rechtsradikal
- Posts: 51258
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: MundaneFatt
20k views on average is bad enough. He ought to have this many.
SpoilerShow

- asdf
- Posts: 202
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:33 am
- Contact:
Re: MundaneFatt
I don't think Larry outright said that it was a lie, or anything, just that he wasn't seeing that huge of a drop.
Regardless, h3h3's entire video was them basically saying, "we, personally, will be fine but nobody who does our type of content will ever get popular and make money again."
- rabidtictac
- Posts: 22434
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: MundaneFatt
Sounds good. So MundaneFatt's fate will be the same as DSP, except he never reached DSP's heights in terms of views and money. The more years pass, the less and less money he'll get until YouTube forgets about him and moves on entirely. Then he'll cry and cry and go work a real job if he can get one.
I don't really have a problem with scumsuckers making less money on YouTube. It's pretty obvious to everyone that when monetization started up in earnest on YouTube, the payout rate was WAY WAY WAY above what those channels were "worth" in terms of revenue. DSP admits this openly. His early contracts were paying him in views rather than ads. And several times, when his MCN called up to renegotiate his contract, they said it was because they were currently paying him more money than his channel was actually earning. Shit was ridiculous.
I'm not sure what anyone can really do about advertisers choosing (of their own free will, and with their own companies) to boycott selling ads to certain channels or on certain platforms. They have that right to decide who gets to shill their stupid products. All this butthurt is because of the rat race of people trying like hell to be paid shills, and angry that they now can't and might have to go do real work and make YouTube videos as a hobby. Or else generate a real product to sell, like garbage t-shirts and worthless mugs.
And that's exactly what a lot of the early ebegging channels did before you could make money off YouTube videos. People ran shitty little internet stores and sold merch, or offered other special products and services. They advertised that stuff using their YT channel, which couldn't directly earn them money.
I don't really have a problem with scumsuckers making less money on YouTube. It's pretty obvious to everyone that when monetization started up in earnest on YouTube, the payout rate was WAY WAY WAY above what those channels were "worth" in terms of revenue. DSP admits this openly. His early contracts were paying him in views rather than ads. And several times, when his MCN called up to renegotiate his contract, they said it was because they were currently paying him more money than his channel was actually earning. Shit was ridiculous.
I'm not sure what anyone can really do about advertisers choosing (of their own free will, and with their own companies) to boycott selling ads to certain channels or on certain platforms. They have that right to decide who gets to shill their stupid products. All this butthurt is because of the rat race of people trying like hell to be paid shills, and angry that they now can't and might have to go do real work and make YouTube videos as a hobby. Or else generate a real product to sell, like garbage t-shirts and worthless mugs.
And that's exactly what a lot of the early ebegging channels did before you could make money off YouTube videos. People ran shitty little internet stores and sold merch, or offered other special products and services. They advertised that stuff using their YT channel, which couldn't directly earn them money.
- rabidtictac
- Posts: 22434
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: MundaneFatt
Also yeah, uploading multiple videos per day is a good way to sudoku interest in your channel.
- Seele
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 3:52 am
- Contact:
Re: MundaneFatt
That's right, Fatt Lardo. Continue acting like a good little Libshit cretin and pretend as though Macron isn't trying to destroy France while LePen is "the devil."
God's in his Heaven/All's right with the world
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: BlueberryRagamuffin, Kugelfisch, Semrush [Bot] and 298 guests