Movie Thread
- CuckTurdginson
- Posts: 6661
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 5:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: Movie Thread
The next Democratic President should use the Unitary Executive theory to gay marry Kugelfisch and Rushy.
rabidtictac wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 11:02 pmDHI is proof you can be both a massive homosexual and a virgin. They're not exclusive. If you display both in large enough quantities you can qualify for mod status.
- VoiceOfReasonPast
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 54075
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: Movie Thread
He will unitary execute it to make it illegal to not be gay.
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
- CuckTurdginson
- Posts: 6661
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 5:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: Movie Thread
Finally, I’ll find a bear and dad will be proud of me.
rabidtictac wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 11:02 pmDHI is proof you can be both a massive homosexual and a virgin. They're not exclusive. If you display both in large enough quantities you can qualify for mod status.
- Kugelfisch
- Gesichert Rechtsradikal
- Posts: 51029
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: Movie Thread
No, it's that you see Bond getting his nuts tenderized, cucked at every chance and finally killed off and find the mere idea of it being a humiliation ritual to be "ludicrous".
You claim I'm paranoid, I say you're blind. That's where we're at. Now that you've caught up on the conversation we're having, my previous post states that if they would turn Bond into a gay nigger transfaggot you'd be blind to that as well because you're a profoundly stupid brand loyalist. Got that so far?
This necessary handholding you through a conversation is why I previously refused to elaborate.
SpoilerShow

- Rushy
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 5579
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 11:52 am
- Location: Don't ask if you don't want to know
- Contact:
Re: Movie Thread
Well, I'm glad you did, because I'm not telepathic. You don't need to start sulking like a girl because I don't read your every feeling.Kugelfisch wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2025 11:20 pmNo, it's that you see Bond getting his nuts tenderized, cucked at every chance and finally killed off and find the mere idea of it being a humiliation ritual to be "ludicrous".
You claim I'm paranoid, I say you're blind. That's where we're at. Now that you've caught up on the conversation we're having, my previous post states that if they would turn Bond into a gay nigger transfaggot you'd be blind to that as well because you're a profoundly stupid brand loyalist. Got that so far?
This necessary handholding you through a conversation is why I previously refused to elaborate.
Anyway, I feel that what you're getting out of the film is simply not the intention of the production team, but merely the result of your own personal bias distorting the events.
The film goes out of its way to celebrate James Bond and everything he stands for, and then some.
Of the three things you mentioned, only one event was designed to humiliate Bond and that's the genital torture. Which Bond endured with laughter, upsetting the villain.
He is quite literally never cucked. Not one woman he sleeps with goes on to be romantic with anyone else.
He dies in the service of his country and MI6, which is the most bittersweet Fleming exit for the character that one could imagine. The film ends with everyone celebrating his life and showing him respect.
At this point, I'd replace the word "paranoid" with delusional. I especially find it funny that you consider me a brand loyalist when this is the first James Bond movie I've liked since World is Not Enough. From 1999. I'm no fan of Royale or Skyfall. But sure, I'm just here for the brand. That's A+ logic right there, man. Bravo.
- Kugelfisch
- Gesichert Rechtsradikal
- Posts: 51029
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: Movie Thread
Excuse me for not keeping up with what movie you specifically mentioned you liked because you apparently like any shit you're served, so I just assumed - rightfully - that you loved the previous Craig slop just as well.
Either way, I follow a simple doctrine. I believe my enemy and take them for their word.
I see Bond played by a faggot getting emasculated for five movies straight, I believe them.
If you weren't an autistic furfag, you would've been able to follow the conversation you didn't realize we were having. I won't ever carry that water for you again, just to have you still not understand basic concepts.
Either way, I follow a simple doctrine. I believe my enemy and take them for their word.
I see Bond played by a faggot getting emasculated for five movies straight, I believe them.
If you weren't an autistic furfag, you would've been able to follow the conversation you didn't realize we were having. I won't ever carry that water for you again, just to have you still not understand basic concepts.
SpoilerShow

- CuckTurdginson
- Posts: 6661
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 5:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: Movie Thread
I assume you’re referring to Casino Royale with the ball electrocution. I feel like that’s consistent with that movies tone. Casino is just grittier than the others. Yeah, Bond gets his balls electrocuted, but he’s also cold as hell when he kills some of the goons in that movie.
I found the first twenty or so minutes and the intro of Die Another Day to be *far* more emasculating for the character. Bond fails at his mission, the segue to the intro being Bond getting waterboarded, and that Madonna song that made my ears bleed? Painful.
I found the first twenty or so minutes and the intro of Die Another Day to be *far* more emasculating for the character. Bond fails at his mission, the segue to the intro being Bond getting waterboarded, and that Madonna song that made my ears bleed? Painful.
rabidtictac wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 11:02 pmDHI is proof you can be both a massive homosexual and a virgin. They're not exclusive. If you display both in large enough quantities you can qualify for mod status.
- Liar Revealed
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 7440
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 2:58 pm
- Location: WA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Movie Thread
I heard Phoebe-Waller Bridge helped write that last movie, and that there was a scene when Bond makes a pass at some woman and she is disgusted instead of seduced.
ジュウワリオはもう死んでいる。
- CuckTurdginson
- Posts: 6661
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 5:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: Movie Thread
I haven’t seen it since theaters so I can’t confirm or deny that. Would’ve had to have been early on in the movie.
EDIT
It was likely his first interaction with the negress.
EDIT
It was likely his first interaction with the negress.
rabidtictac wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 11:02 pmDHI is proof you can be both a massive homosexual and a virgin. They're not exclusive. If you display both in large enough quantities you can qualify for mod status.
- Rushy
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 5579
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 11:52 am
- Location: Don't ask if you don't want to know
- Contact:
Re: Movie Thread
It's gratifying to hear from someone with an IQ above that of a glass of water.CuckTurdginson wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 3:00 amI assume you’re referring to Casino Royale with the ball electrocution. I feel like that’s consistent with that movies tone. Casino is just grittier than the others. Yeah, Bond gets his balls electrocuted, but he’s also cold as hell when he kills some of the goons in that movie.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 216 guests