Miscarriage of Acchild
Re: Spergcuck of Nignog
Jojo was soiled the moment the 2012 anime came out and Tumblr discovered it.
- rabidtictac
- Posts: 20320
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:25 pm
Re: Spergcuck of Nignog
>portraying a manlet neckbeard literal cuck as a jojo character
that's so low-effort I'm not even going to greentext properly to mock it
that's so low-effort I'm not even going to greentext properly to mock it
Re: Spergcuck of Nignog
Miscarriage of Acchild is a manlet?
Those nigger genes haven't helped him at all.
Those nigger genes haven't helped him at all.
Re: Spergcuck of Nignog
lol I just found that image. Had no idea it would trigger that many people XD
Re: Spergcuck of Nignog
More like annoyed, i admit i overreacted
-On the internet, everyone end up being Spoony or Tim Buckley
-All fanbases are shit
-Most people had, have and will have shit tastes
-All fanbases are shit
-Most people had, have and will have shit tastes
Re: Spergcuck of Nignog
I don't know who I hate more: assholes who point the camera at themselves when sperging about politicks/youtube drama or the same assholes using a furrsona/anime avatar to express the same talking points.
I mean, how do you want me to takeyour opinions on the syrian conflict seriously when it is said by an astronaut mouse?
I mean, how do you want me to takeyour opinions on the syrian conflict seriously when it is said by an astronaut mouse?
Re: Spergcuck of Nignog
Sargoon's face is disgusting enough that I'd let the furrfag slide.
Re: Spergcuck of Nignog
Surprise surprise, Miscarriage of Acchild is a stupid cunt who rushed out his list of principles without thinking it through. JF rips his stupid made up ideology to shreds, I can't wait until he tries to sell his political system to the masses, especially his vaguely written shit like "Nobody is entitled to receive benefits that they did not earn or to which they are not already entitled to by being a citizen". He is so autistically devoted to Meritocracy that as JF pointed out, this policy would mean that children aren't entitled to inherit their parents money when they die. What happens to the money in that instance isn't explained since Miscarriage of Acchild pulled this shit out of his ass in a fucking day and called it an ideology.
JF wrote:Miscarriage of Acchild needs to give a more serious look at his values. This is a process which every political thinker has been through, except Miscarriage of Acchild it seems.
Old Black Man wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2019 9:11 pmAlso Lupa’s grandmother? Please, we know that hag was alive and well back then. She’s like the dude from Highlander, only a cunt.
- rabidtictac
- Posts: 20320
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:25 pm
Re: Spergcuck of Nignog
Any time you remove inheritance/property/power from the family (the dynasty, I guess, or the estate), it goes into the state.
If there is no state, it goes to whatever warlord or shiteating dictator is in power.
This is also something ancaps don't understand, but it's a more general problem with them. They think a power vacuum can just exist forever with nobody filling it. If it isn't kids inheriting property "unearned" from their parents, it'll be some state official inheriting that same property unearned from strangers who have less power than them.
As for who is entitled to what, this is where I dip my shitlib bedora, because I'd rather give old people a bare minimum of shelter and food than see them dying in the streets. Same for children.
Another route to take with this "entitled" idea is to say that nobody is entitled to anything except what they can scrape from this earth, aka The Will to Power. So I could attack the notion that way too. I'm entitled to do a thing if I do it and nobody can stop me. I'm not entitled if I do a thing and you stop me. What does "entitled" mean anyway, except some kind of social contract in which both sides don't feel ripped off? But sometimes one or both parties might feel ripped off and go along with the "entitlement" anyway, because the state forces them to adhere to the agreement. So if the state is forcing you into a deal where you feel ripped off (like paying inheritance tax on income that was already taxed,) is the state still "entitled" to that money? Or does the Will to Power come into play again? The state does it because you can't stop them and they are entitled because you cannot stop them.
A lot of ideas that seem cool in theory don't work at all in practice. Meritocracy is a good ideal to have in current year (where the mainstream media are all about the opposite), but you can't go full retard with it.
If there is no state, it goes to whatever warlord or shiteating dictator is in power.
This is also something ancaps don't understand, but it's a more general problem with them. They think a power vacuum can just exist forever with nobody filling it. If it isn't kids inheriting property "unearned" from their parents, it'll be some state official inheriting that same property unearned from strangers who have less power than them.
As for who is entitled to what, this is where I dip my shitlib bedora, because I'd rather give old people a bare minimum of shelter and food than see them dying in the streets. Same for children.
Another route to take with this "entitled" idea is to say that nobody is entitled to anything except what they can scrape from this earth, aka The Will to Power. So I could attack the notion that way too. I'm entitled to do a thing if I do it and nobody can stop me. I'm not entitled if I do a thing and you stop me. What does "entitled" mean anyway, except some kind of social contract in which both sides don't feel ripped off? But sometimes one or both parties might feel ripped off and go along with the "entitlement" anyway, because the state forces them to adhere to the agreement. So if the state is forcing you into a deal where you feel ripped off (like paying inheritance tax on income that was already taxed,) is the state still "entitled" to that money? Or does the Will to Power come into play again? The state does it because you can't stop them and they are entitled because you cannot stop them.
A lot of ideas that seem cool in theory don't work at all in practice. Meritocracy is a good ideal to have in current year (where the mainstream media are all about the opposite), but you can't go full retard with it.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], pibbs, TheBilthCollector and 35 guests