The style reminds me of some of the editorials he made in the past, except the subject matter is less annoying (the editorials were him trying to answer some loaded question like "Does Romeo and Juliet suck?").
Doge Walker and Channel Awesome
- VoiceOfReasonPast
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 48967
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
Re: Doge Walker and Channel Awesome
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
Re: Doge Walker and Channel Awesome
At least angry reviewers weren't forcing their political opinions down the audience's throats like video essayists do. Video Essayists make their videos ridiculously long even when it's about drama like Lindsay's 1 1/2 hr Magmum Opus Mask Off.Newhalf wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 6:48 pmYou may not like "le angry reviewer" but it seems they've been replaced with a bunch of stupid zoomers talking in a nasal whiny voice about old Simpsons episodes and other garbage media that was aired long before they were even born in a super pretentious 'analytical' way as if it were pieces of classical art.
Not sure what's worse.
- Dingus Bajingus
- Posts: 1418
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2019 8:06 pm
- Location: Lilac City, Burgerland
Re: Doge Walker and Channel Awesome
The new shit is worse. This is by no means a defense of the "le angry reviewer" junk, mind you. I simply find it marginally less morally enraging than people who read a couple TV Tropes pages and Wiki synopses, then think they totally deserve cash money dollars for having an opinion on Ninja Turtles.Newhalf wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 6:48 pmYou may not like "le angry reviewer" but it seems they've been replaced with a bunch of stupid zoomers talking in a nasal whiny voice about old Simpsons episodes and other garbage media that was aired long before they were even born in a super pretentious 'analytical' way as if it were pieces of classical art.
Not sure what's worse.
Re: Doge Walker and Channel Awesome
There are a few decent "video essayists", but those are usually good only when they go into background of the show/movie/game, and not analyzing the content.
- Moe Bitches
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 5656
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2019 4:54 am
- Location: Hell on Earth
- Contact:
Re: Doge Walker and Channel Awesome
It's like a downgrade of historicans. But also, it's not good to be restricted with stuff that's from your lifetime. Hats Off Entertainment talks about a bunch of "boomer" media like the Three Stooges or Nation Lampoon even though he's like twenty five years old. Although he falls in-between talking about the contents of the media and the background behind it.
Re: Doge Walker and Channel Awesome
Alright, them talking about stuff from before their time is admittedly not the issue. It's more that they don't do any research and as stated before just read from Wikipedia where information is often phenomenally inaccurate, to put it generously.
It's a trap!
- VoiceOfReasonPast
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 48967
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
Re: Doge Walker and Channel Awesome
The issue is when you apply your current year special snowflake morality and get offended about "problematic" content.
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
- Moe Bitches
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 5656
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2019 4:54 am
- Location: Hell on Earth
- Contact:
Re: Doge Walker and Channel Awesome
Doge Focker.
da PAC Nigguh wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:06 amShit like this is why satire is dead in currentyear.
- Liar Revealed
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 6906
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 2:58 pm
- Location: WA, USA
Re: Doge Walker and Channel Awesome
That seems to have been Lindsay Ellis's shtick almost since the beginning. I still remember how intellectually dishonest she was when she reviewed the banned Looney Toons short Coal Black and de Sebben Dwarfs.VoiceOfReasonPast wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 11:24 amThe issue is when you apply your current year special snowflake morality and get offended about "problematic" content.
お前はもう死んでいる。
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot] and 57 guests