Clown World General
- VoiceOfReasonPast
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 47642
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
Re: Shitlib debates: Clown world 2020
>allowing obscure, unpredictable activists with agendas into polidicks
You don't say
And were "faithless electors" ever prevalent enough to actually affect the presidential election? I always got the impression these guys where only of symbolic nature and would generate lynch mobs if they actually did their own thing.
You don't say
And were "faithless electors" ever prevalent enough to actually affect the presidential election? I always got the impression these guys where only of symbolic nature and would generate lynch mobs if they actually did their own thing.
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
- mad bum
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 17988
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 11:15 pm
- Location: In spoony's rape dungeon
Re: Shitlib debates: Clown world 2020
From what I'm reading you're generally supposed to vote for whatever the people want but if you think orange man is bad you could vote for democrat instead. I guess there's good and bad things about this.
SpoilerShow
Re: Shitlib debates: Clown world 2020
Screeching fucktards tried to harass them to get them to change their vote when Trump won in 2016, and some did go faithless. But generally speaking, some states have faithless elector laws and I think all of them have a set of alternates they can replace faithless electors withVoiceOfReasonPast wrote: ↑Mon Jul 06, 2020 9:11 pmAnd were "faithless electors" ever prevalent enough to actually affect the presidential election? I always got the impression these guys where only of symbolic nature and would generate lynch mobs if they actually did their own thing.
- Le Redditeur
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 11433
- Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2017 5:58 pm
Re: Shitlib debates: Clown world 2020
I remember Hillary lost more votes to faithless electors than Trump. It was very, very pathetic.
Re: Shitlib debates: Clown world 2020
There was temper tantrums to get electors to switch to Hillary in 2016 but 98% didn't because they knew how much of a shit show that would be. That's why the new thing is pushing in blue states that they would try to give their electoral college votes to the national popular vote winner even though that winner lost in that state
Re: Shitlib debates: Clown world 2020
The trans-snowflakes thread reminded me of how incredibly hilarious Biden's shirts are
Some of them tried but the courts said 'no'.
- Singh'sSpot
- Posts: 728
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 5:06 am
Re: Shitlib debates: Clown world 2020
babbling as usual.
Something tells me when the debates happen the moderators are gonna ask Trump all the hardball questions and Bumbling Biden the soft ones.
Something tells me when the debates happen the moderators are gonna ask Trump all the hardball questions and Bumbling Biden the soft ones.
Re: Shitlib debates: Clown world 2020
Well that's what they did in 2016.Singh'sSpot wrote: ↑Thu Jul 09, 2020 5:39 pmSomething tells me when the debates happen the moderators are gonna ask Trump all the hardball questions and Bumbling Biden the soft ones.
Trump usually shows his strength in the debates, because he has to fight not only his opponent but the fucking fake news moderators as well
Re: Shitlib debates: Clown world 2020
I'm thinking they may Choose Duckworth as a potential VP.
SpoilerShow
EVERY POST I HAVE EVER MADE HERE IS SATIRE. I DO NOT CONDONE NOR SUPPORT ANY OF THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED ON THIS FORUM.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests