>not posting the far superior stealer's wheel original
Collapse of the West (Purge General Thread)
Re: Collapse of the West (Purge General Thread)
SpoilerShow
EVERY POST I HAVE EVER MADE HERE IS SATIRE. I DO NOT CONDONE NOR SUPPORT ANY OF THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED ON THIS FORUM.
- Moe Bitches
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 5656
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2019 4:54 am
- Location: Hell on Earth
- Contact:
Re: Collapse of the West (Purge General Thread)
Who is this bitch?
da PAC Nigguh wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:06 amShit like this is why satire is dead in currentyear.
- MegaNigger
- Blackpill Merchant
- Posts: 9232
- Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 5:52 pm
Re: Collapse of the West (Purge General Thread)
idk but she looks like she sucks a mean dick
-The user formerly known as CIANigger
Re: Collapse of the West (Purge General Thread)
Why same sex? This is just to allow adult homosexuals to fuck teen homosexuals, which has been a double standard for some time now but still.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 5:01 am
SpoilerShow
EVERY POST I HAVE EVER MADE HERE IS SATIRE. I DO NOT CONDONE NOR SUPPORT ANY OF THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED ON THIS FORUM.
- Le Redditeur
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 11518
- Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2017 5:58 pm
Re: Collapse of the West (Purge General Thread)
A victory for NAMBLA.
Re: Collapse of the West (Purge General Thread)
- mad bum
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 17989
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 11:15 pm
- Location: In spoony's rape dungeon
Re: Collapse of the West (Purge General Thread)
Gay men are actual faggots, like the south park joke. All they do is talk about fucking dudes and have an app dedicated to spreading there aids.
SpoilerShow
Re: Collapse of the West (Purge General Thread)
The excuse they give is that heterosexuals already are judged with this discretion and instead of closing the loophole like a normal person would have done they expanded it.
But what they didn't tell people was why the discretion for heterosexuals is the requirements for it to work. First, it was only allowed with vaginal penetration with the reasoning that if the minor being a girl got pregnant that the father would be able to support the child. So child support in the sense. Of course butt fucking has zero to do with making children and the figs are avoiding bringing that up.
Another thing is that while the minor can't be younger than 14, the 10 year gap is way too much obviously. Most people would take a 5 year gap since it would make sense from a logical point. We already know that 2 teens can be dating and the girl's parents don't like the boyfriend so the second he turns 18 and she is still underage they file a complaint of him fucking a minor. This is what the discretion that people will accept. That's why there are Romeo and Juliet laws in a bunch of states.
By having the 10 year gap, you have 24 year olds fucking 14 year olds and no normal person will accept that since it's a full grown adult screwing a underage teen.
And of course when I found out who created and pushed the bill, I wasn't surprised. He's the one who pushed and suceeded to remove it being a felony to knowingly give someone HIV.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests