SESTA (AKA sex workers are lazier than internet nobodies: job edition)

Shitpost about Trump, SJWs, Islam and everything else about politics except economics, because that's too hard
User avatar
Guest

Re: SESTA (AKA sex workers are lazier than internet nobodies: job edition)

Post by Guest » Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:03 pm

Making women's lives more difficult is a reward in itself.
Only true scum see prostitutes, "normal" people just jack to free porn and get on with their day.

User avatar
Kugelfisch
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 11004
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:36 pm

Re: SESTA (AKA sex workers are lazier than internet nobodies: job edition)

Post by Kugelfisch » Fri Jun 22, 2018 10:43 pm

Guest wrote:
Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:03 pm
Only true scum see prostitutes, "normal" people just jack to free porn and get on with their day.
Quoted for truth. Why fuck a disease hoarder?

User avatar
rabidtictac
Posts: 7917
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:25 pm

Re: SESTA (AKA sex workers are lazier than internet nobodies: job edition)

Post by rabidtictac » Sat Jun 23, 2018 2:33 am

Because thirst is MASSIVELY strong.

I'm gonna keep linking rang3r videos forever, sadly. They'll never ever stop being relevant.

User avatar
BlueberryRagamuffin
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:45 pm

Re: SESTA (AKA sex workers are lazier than internet nobodies: job edition)

Post by BlueberryRagamuffin » Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:43 am

One of my friends used to post her Backpage ads using a credit card she shared with her dad. One day he was looking over the bill and asked what the $15 charge from "backpage.com" was for. She told him it was a site she used to order food. He seemed to buy her story, but I wonder if this being in the news brought back any memories. Or maybe he already knew and was just playing dumb.

User avatar
Guest

Re: SESTA (AKA sex workers are lazier than internet nobodies: job edition)

Post by Guest » Sun Jul 01, 2018 1:25 am

Having a daughter = auto-failing as a parent. Theres no way to win.

User avatar
Kugelfisch
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 11004
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:36 pm

Re: SESTA (AKA sex workers are lazier than internet nobodies: job edition)

Post by Kugelfisch » Sun Jul 01, 2018 1:30 am

Guest wrote:
Sun Jul 01, 2018 1:25 am
Having a daughter = auto-failing as a parent. Theres no way to win.
You could take a hike in the mountains or maybe there's an extra pillow accidentally lying in the child's bed.

User avatar
Keith Chegwin
Posts: 3620
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 9:42 am
Location: In jail for tax evasion

Re: SESTA (AKA sex workers are lazier than internet nobodies: job edition)

Post by Keith Chegwin » Sun Jul 01, 2018 3:17 am

BlueberryRagamuffin wrote:
Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:43 am
One of my friends used to post her Backpage ads using a credit card she shared with her dad. One day he was looking over the bill and asked what the $15 charge from "backpage.com" was for. She told him it was a site she used to order food. He seemed to buy her story, but I wonder if this being in the news brought back any memories. Or maybe he already knew and was just playing dumb.
If he had half a brain he would have looked up 'backpage.com' instead of asking his daughter what it is. Unless he did that and only asked her to see if she would tell the truth
VoiceOfReasonPast wrote:
Sat Jan 06, 2018 8:31 am
Doki doki is what you get in your kokoro when everything goes according to keikaku and senpai finally notices you.

User avatar
BlueberryRagamuffin
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:45 pm

Re: SESTA (AKA sex workers are lazier than internet nobodies: job edition)

Post by BlueberryRagamuffin » Sun Jul 01, 2018 5:15 am

Keith Chegwin wrote:
Sun Jul 01, 2018 3:17 am
If he had half a brain he would have looked up 'backpage.com' instead of asking his daughter what it is. Unless he did that and only asked her to see if she would tell the truth
She didn't use the bank so her dad let her use his and she reimbursed him in cash for her charges. IIRC she was sitting there while he was going over the monthly statement and he asked what the backpage.com charge was for out of curiosity rather than concern. I don't think he would have cared enough to Google it even if he had been alone when he went over the statement.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests