Women gets six months for killing boyfriend in YouTube prank attempt

Shitpost about Trump, SJWs, Islam and everything else about politics except economics, because that's too hard
fuckface
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 10:43 pm

Women gets six months for killing boyfriend in YouTube prank attempt

Post by fuckface » Fri Mar 16, 2018 9:59 am

https://uk.yahoo.com/news/pregnant-woma ... 00070.html

So this woman somehow gets only six months, not entirely in jail mind you, for killing a man by seeing if a bullet could pierce a dictionary by putting it next to his chest. Maybe they could have, not immediately jumped to that without some kind of test? Would it have been impossible to just fucking shoot at a dictionary at a shooting range or something before risking ending the life of the father of two? Did Pedro Ruiz get off scott free despite claiming the stunt was safe?

User avatar
veris leta facies
Posts: 2900
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2017 7:26 pm

Re: Women gets six months for killing boyfriend in YouTube prank attempt

Post by veris leta facies » Fri Mar 16, 2018 11:21 am

Some fucking book doesn't stop even a .22 LR, they did it with no less than Desert Eagle .50. It makes me sick such a retarded people had reproduced. There should be a licence to have children.
When passing through the Valley of Humiliation, slaves and dastards, exposing their sores, sob aloud for consolation and sympathy.

User avatar
Kugelfisch
The white ghost
Posts: 46453
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:36 pm

Re: Women gets six months for killing boyfriend in YouTube prank attempt

Post by Kugelfisch » Fri Mar 16, 2018 12:41 pm

There's actually a good chance of a .50 AE stopping quite early on in paper, relatively speaking. You of course under no circumstance whatsoever point or even fire a gun at somebody you don't actually want to shoot. That should be a no-brainer.
SpoilerShow
Image
Cannons bray, the mighty quake!
Centuries of blood becomes erased!
I am the white ghost!

User avatar
veris leta facies
Posts: 2900
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2017 7:26 pm

Re: Women gets six months for killing boyfriend in YouTube prank attempt

Post by veris leta facies » Fri Mar 16, 2018 1:38 pm

Kugelfisch wrote:
Fri Mar 16, 2018 12:41 pm
There's actually a good chance of a .50 AE stopping quite early on in paper, relatively speaking.
Mad Pedro sure put his life at stake for that.

It seems this is actually 8 months old news. Someone tested how much paper it really takes to stop .50 AE.

When passing through the Valley of Humiliation, slaves and dastards, exposing their sores, sob aloud for consolation and sympathy.

User avatar
Kugelfisch
The white ghost
Posts: 46453
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:36 pm

Re: Women gets six months for killing boyfriend in YouTube prank attempt

Post by Kugelfisch » Fri Mar 16, 2018 2:52 pm

veris leta facies wrote:
Fri Mar 16, 2018 1:38 pm
Kugelfisch wrote:
Fri Mar 16, 2018 12:41 pm
There's actually a good chance of a .50 AE stopping quite early on in paper, relatively speaking.
Mad Pedro sure put his life at stake for that.
Which is madly stupid. .50 AE isn't .50 AE. Numbers matter. What laboration, how many grains, how hot is the cartridge? How many pages does the book have and how heavy is the paper? Long-barreled Deagle or regular? At what distance?
I do believe they actually did make a test shot. Let's assume the projectile stopped. Would you trust somebody, anybody, to hit that book while you're holding it in front of you? Would you trust the projectile of the next cartridge to mushroom just like that in the next book?
The reason for proper gun safety being very strict is that you can never fully predict the outcome. Accidents can always happen and if something goes wrong it goes terribly wrong.
SpoilerShow
Image
Cannons bray, the mighty quake!
Centuries of blood becomes erased!
I am the white ghost!

User avatar
Keith Chegwin
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 10349
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 9:42 am

Re: Women gets six months for killing boyfriend in YouTube prank attempt

Post by Keith Chegwin » Fri Mar 16, 2018 4:35 pm

Six months seems pretty lenient for manslaughter
Kugelfisch wrote:
Sat Mar 21, 2020 2:05 am
Imagine spending a billion US dollars to be a loser. Could've watched animu and be one for free.

User avatar
Kugelfisch
The white ghost
Posts: 46453
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:36 pm

Re: Women gets six months for killing boyfriend in YouTube prank attempt

Post by Kugelfisch » Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:27 pm

Intention is always important.
SpoilerShow
Image
Cannons bray, the mighty quake!
Centuries of blood becomes erased!
I am the white ghost!

User avatar
VoiceOfReasonPast
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 47635
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm

Re: Women gets six months for killing boyfriend in YouTube prank attempt

Post by VoiceOfReasonPast » Fri Mar 16, 2018 6:14 pm

So all you need to do for the near-perfect crime is to be really, really stupid?
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly

4 wikia: static -> vignette

User avatar
mad bum
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 17988
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 11:15 pm
Location: In spoony's rape dungeon

Re: Women gets six months for killing boyfriend in YouTube prank attempt

Post by mad bum » Fri Mar 16, 2018 7:54 pm

It's just a prank bro.
Image
SpoilerShow
phpBB [video]

User avatar
da PAC Nigguh
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 6713
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 1:06 am

Re: Women gets six months for killing boyfriend in YouTube prank attempt

Post by da PAC Nigguh » Fri Mar 16, 2018 8:22 pm

Keith Chegwin wrote:
Fri Mar 16, 2018 4:35 pm
Six months seems pretty lenient for manslaughter
Hey, Bruce Jenner got nada.
Is Spoony dead yet?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 15 guests