Page 42 of 49

Re: RIP Sweden v3.2

Posted: Fri May 22, 2020 2:28 pm
by Duwango
As praised Kek always says: Burn the coal, pay the toll!

Re: RIP Sweden v3.2

Posted: Fri May 22, 2020 3:46 pm
by VoiceOfReasonPast
veris leta facies wrote:
Fri May 22, 2020 2:02 pm
We had exactly the same case early this year:
I think we had a case like that about once per year back when the rapefugee crisis was all the rage. Dunno how far Left the unfortunate victims were, though.

Re: RIP Sweden v3.2

Posted: Fri May 22, 2020 7:26 pm
by Kugelfisch
Whenever you hear a "woman killed by ex-husband" story it's almost always a foreigner. With child abduction, although very rare, it's always a foreigner.

Re: RIP Sweden v3.2

Posted: Fri May 22, 2020 7:31 pm
by Guest
Kugelfisch wrote:
Fri May 22, 2020 7:26 pm
Whenever you hear a "woman killed by ex-husband" story it's almost always a foreigner.
Which is a shame. White men need to learn to take out the trash.
Kugelfisch wrote:
Fri May 22, 2020 7:26 pm
With child abduction, although very rare, it's always a foreigner.
Brownskins sure do love children. Isn't that odd?

Re: RIP Sweden v3.2

Posted: Fri May 22, 2020 7:32 pm
by Kugelfisch
Guest wrote:
Fri May 22, 2020 7:31 pm
Brownskins sure do love children. Isn't that odd?
I should clarify that by child abduction I mean the father taking the child away from the mother, usually by fleeing to some other nation.

Re: RIP Sweden v3.2

Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 4:06 pm
by Tony Schiavone
Been a while since we checked in with them:
  • Åsa Linderborg, cultural editor for newspaper Aftonbladet, admits that "everyone who did not want open borders or wanted to talk about integration was branded as fascists" and had their opinions stifled.
  • They're getting shamed for not doing a damn thing during the lockdown (but it's CNN, so who knows if it's actually good news or not)

Re: RIP Sweden v3.2

Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 4:10 pm
by Dehbashi
Actually people who were against lockdowns were pointing at how Sweden didn't really do lockdowns and how it has been a success there for the long term and you can see it.

Re: RIP Sweden v3.2

Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 5:14 pm
by Guest
Dehbashi wrote:
Wed Jul 22, 2020 4:10 pm
Actually people who were against lockdowns were pointing at how Sweden didn't really do lockdowns and how it has been a success there for the long term and you can see it.
Well yeah. Everyone has to get the fucking thing, so just let everyone get it, eat shit for a couple of months and then you're done. "pandemic" over.

Re: RIP Sweden v3.2

Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 10:36 pm
by Poonoo
Dehbashi wrote:
Wed Jul 22, 2020 4:10 pm
Actually people who were against lockdowns were pointing at how Sweden didn't really do lockdowns and how it has been a success there for the long term and you can see it.
While Sweden's deaths are high they are in line with Italy, France and the UK even though they had lockdowns. And in Australia the state of Victoria has a second wave going on that's as bad as the first for the whole country combined, and despite lockdowns the cases keep rising.

The jury is out on lockdowns, we still won't know if Sweden accidentally did a good thing until well after this is over.

Re: RIP Sweden v3.2

Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2020 4:31 am
by VoiceOfReasonPast
Poonoo wrote:
Wed Jul 22, 2020 10:36 pm
While Sweden's deaths are high they are in line with Italy, France and the UK even though they had lockdowns.
Italy, France and the UK also have populations that are at least 6 times higher than Sweden's.