RIP Sweden v3.2

Shitpost about Trump, SJWs, Islam and everything else about politics except economics, because that's too hard
User avatar
VoiceOfReasonPast
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 15077
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm

Re: RIP Sweden v3.2

Post by VoiceOfReasonPast » Wed Feb 27, 2019 8:49 pm

They're just afraid the robots will take away their most important weapon: sex, and the promise of it.
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly

Cucked in the name of Soy, Ye not complicit.

User avatar
Credo in Deum
Posts: 496
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2018 7:51 pm

Re: RIP Sweden v3.2

Post by Credo in Deum » Wed Feb 27, 2019 10:08 pm

>SJW's declare they can't compete with real NPC's
the memes write themselves
SpoilerShow
Image

User avatar
Guest

Re: RIP Sweden v3.2

Post by Guest » Thu Feb 28, 2019 4:37 am

Even the sex industry is being replaced by automation. When are we gonna toss whores over the wall with the spics.

User avatar
Keith Chegwin
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 6360
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 9:42 am
Location: In jail for tax evasion

Re: RIP Sweden v3.2

Post by Keith Chegwin » Thu Feb 28, 2019 6:23 am

Ah yes. 'Muh objectification'. The most meaningless of all feminist complaints. Especially dumb here as sex robots literally are objects
VoiceOfReasonPast wrote:
Sat Jan 06, 2018 8:31 am
Doki doki is what you get in your kokoro when everything goes according to keikaku and senpai finally notices you.

User avatar
Guest

Re: RIP Sweden v3.2

Post by Guest » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:30 am

Women aren't smart enough to realize all a human being really is is an object.

User avatar
Poonoo
Bureaucrat
Posts: 4086
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2017 1:16 pm

Re: RIP Sweden v3.2

Post by Poonoo » Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:11 pm

veris leta facies wrote:
Wed Feb 27, 2019 8:23 pm
In progressive Sweden, feminists are now wanting to ban sexrobots. :lol:

https://www.expressen.se/debatt/lagstif ... robotarna/

Here's the google translate, it's accurate enough:
SpoilerShow
We need a team against malicious sex robots

"Sex robots" and "sex dolls" reinforce and normalize the view of women as objects and normalize men's violence against women.

It is time for stricter legislation so that new technology does not reproduce values ​​about exploiting women's bodies, writes Sweden's women's lobby, Roks and Unizon.

DEBATE | SEXROBOTS. We were able to read the news in Dagens Nyheter that so-called "sex robots" are ready to be shipped out from a factory in San Diego to men who are willing to buy human-like, AI-driven robots with the purpose of obeying and performing sexual acts whenever the owner pleases . In November, Finland's first brothel was opened with so-called "sex dolls". In December, the news came that the customs seized "sex dolls" ordered online, which are similar to children. A first thought is that this is a harmless phenomenon because the robots are just products and not people, but the presence of these robots says a lot about our time. Why are men willing to pay tens of thousands of dollars for a robot that obeys their smallest command?

Robots for rapists and pedophiles

Many of the "sex robots" and "sex dolls" that are produced have the appearance and attributes typical of the objectifying, sexualized and humiliated woman found in today's mainstream pornography. She also says no to something that the man wants, if she is not programmed to do so. Many robots are even programmed to exhibit resistance so that the man who has sex with the robot can live out his rape fantasies. It is also not unusual for both robots and dolls to represent children, so that adult men can simulate child abuse.

From previous research in similar areas, we know that the type of fantasies that are stimulated by new technology often lead to real violence against girls and women. Clear parallels can be drawn to pornography research where the link between consumption of pornography leads to sexist attitudes towards women and actual violence. If pornography that many are perceived as "watching something" can inspire abuse, what do we expect that human-like robots that men interact with should lead to?

Dangerous dehumanization

AI and ethics researcher Kathleen Richardson believes that the dehumanization of certain groups, in this case women, justifies slavery and the exploitation of the female body through new technology is part of this. Don't let the technological development be controlled by the sex industry. The development of new technology will make it easier for people, make the world a more equal and equal place, not the other way around!
Long sperg below:
SpoilerShow
This has been going on for a while. Feminists know that they are broken, shitty women who offer nothing to men but their cunts. Without their vagina they have no power to manipulate men in power to do their bidding, as Kugel has said they are only allowed to do this tyrannical shit is because men allow it. Ragamuffin mentioned that men want companionship so this shit won't take off, but if they feel women in general aren't offering that in the far future (sex robots being realistic enough in movement are way off, posters here will be all either insanely old or dying) they'll just resort to the bots since they'll be better for just the sex.

All these arguments about how this perpetuates rape culture are bullshit and they know it, they are just scared of losing power. And oddly enough, I actually think this could be a good thing for gender relations since this essentially multiplies the number of "women" in the sexual marketplace and when there are way more women than men women tend to be nicer to men due to their scarcity. This will make real women have no choice but to offer men more than just sex in a relationship, because sexually men will be ultra picky and will start talking like Zyzz when a 5/10 would hit on him on dating sites. I feel this would counter hypergamy which is the core reason why men and women are marrying less and having less kids, women are tend to marry up slightly (this isn't a conscious thing for the most part, most women aren't blatant gold diggers) and when they do just as well or better than men (like they are for people under 30) they start to wonder "where have the real men gone?".

There is a reason why some men think women are better in Eastern Europe, South East Asia and with black guys Brazil. Over there you have more money and status, so the women are nicer to you to the point where you wonder why women back home aren't like that. What they don't get is that these women aren't like that to their men, I remember rpgworm saying on an older iteration of DHI that Brazilian women are actually ultra conservative sexually unless they are around the gringo (he's Brazilian). Back in the traditional days when women didn't work most men with a decent job were considered worthy mates but now women will look at them and say "I don't know, he's nice and all but he's just not my type". That's the lizard brain kicking in, and because of that women aren't as feminine towards men as they used to. This is why socially awkward weebs love waifus, they are an extreme version of femininity that are only liked by betas with no masculine traits what so ever.

You can't go back to traditionalism though because capitalism got women out of the kitchen. Most jobs used to be manual labour so women didn't work, and without modern technology housework was a full time job along with the fact that people used to have 8 kids since at least 4 would die. That has changed, we live in a modern world but have a caveman subconscious that can't keep up.
No citizen has a right to be an amateur in the matter of physical training...what a disgrace it is for a man to grow old without ever seeing the beauty and strength of which his body is capable.
- Socrates

User avatar
CIANIgger
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 4945
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 5:52 pm

Re: RIP Sweden v3.2

Post by CIANIgger » Thu Feb 28, 2019 3:48 pm

Poonoo wrote:
Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:11 pm
veris leta facies wrote:
Wed Feb 27, 2019 8:23 pm
In progressive Sweden, feminists are now wanting to ban sexrobots. :lol:

https://www.expressen.se/debatt/lagstif ... robotarna/

Here's the google translate, it's accurate enough:
SpoilerShow
We need a team against malicious sex robots

"Sex robots" and "sex dolls" reinforce and normalize the view of women as objects and normalize men's violence against women.

It is time for stricter legislation so that new technology does not reproduce values ​​about exploiting women's bodies, writes Sweden's women's lobby, Roks and Unizon.

DEBATE | SEXROBOTS. We were able to read the news in Dagens Nyheter that so-called "sex robots" are ready to be shipped out from a factory in San Diego to men who are willing to buy human-like, AI-driven robots with the purpose of obeying and performing sexual acts whenever the owner pleases . In November, Finland's first brothel was opened with so-called "sex dolls". In December, the news came that the customs seized "sex dolls" ordered online, which are similar to children. A first thought is that this is a harmless phenomenon because the robots are just products and not people, but the presence of these robots says a lot about our time. Why are men willing to pay tens of thousands of dollars for a robot that obeys their smallest command?

Robots for rapists and pedophiles

Many of the "sex robots" and "sex dolls" that are produced have the appearance and attributes typical of the objectifying, sexualized and humiliated woman found in today's mainstream pornography. She also says no to something that the man wants, if she is not programmed to do so. Many robots are even programmed to exhibit resistance so that the man who has sex with the robot can live out his rape fantasies. It is also not unusual for both robots and dolls to represent children, so that adult men can simulate child abuse.

From previous research in similar areas, we know that the type of fantasies that are stimulated by new technology often lead to real violence against girls and women. Clear parallels can be drawn to pornography research where the link between consumption of pornography leads to sexist attitudes towards women and actual violence. If pornography that many are perceived as "watching something" can inspire abuse, what do we expect that human-like robots that men interact with should lead to?

Dangerous dehumanization

AI and ethics researcher Kathleen Richardson believes that the dehumanization of certain groups, in this case women, justifies slavery and the exploitation of the female body through new technology is part of this. Don't let the technological development be controlled by the sex industry. The development of new technology will make it easier for people, make the world a more equal and equal place, not the other way around!
Long sperg below:
SpoilerShow
This has been going on for a while. Feminists know that they are broken, shitty women who offer nothing to men but their cunts. Without their vagina they have no power to manipulate men in power to do their bidding, as Kugel has said they are only allowed to do this tyrannical shit is because men allow it. Ragamuffin mentioned that men want companionship so this shit won't take off, but if they feel women in general aren't offering that in the far future (sex robots being realistic enough in movement are way off, posters here will be all either insanely old or dying) they'll just resort to the bots since they'll be better for just the sex.

All these arguments about how this perpetuates rape culture are bullshit and they know it, they are just scared of losing power. And oddly enough, I actually think this could be a good thing for gender relations since this essentially multiplies the number of "women" in the sexual marketplace and when there are way more women than men women tend to be nicer to men due to their scarcity. This will make real women have no choice but to offer men more than just sex in a relationship, because sexually men will be ultra picky and will start talking like Zyzz when a 5/10 would hit on him on dating sites. I feel this would counter hypergamy which is the core reason why men and women are marrying less and having less kids, women are tend to marry up slightly (this isn't a conscious thing for the most part, most women aren't blatant gold diggers) and when they do just as well or better than men (like they are for people under 30) they start to wonder "where have the real men gone?".

There is a reason why some men think women are better in Eastern Europe, South East Asia and with black guys Brazil. Over there you have more money and status, so the women are nicer to you to the point where you wonder why women back home aren't like that. What they don't get is that these women aren't like that to their men, I remember rpgworm saying on an older iteration of DHI that Brazilian women are actually ultra conservative sexually unless they are around the gringo (he's Brazilian). Back in the traditional days when women didn't work most men with a decent job were considered worthy mates but now women will look at them and say "I don't know, he's nice and all but he's just not my type". That's the lizard brain kicking in, and because of that women aren't as feminine towards men as they used to. This is why socially awkward weebs love waifus, they are an extreme version of femininity that are only liked by betas with no masculine traits what so ever.

You can't go back to traditionalism though because capitalism got women out of the kitchen. Most jobs used to be manual labour so women didn't work, and without modern technology housework was a full time job along with the fact that people used to have 8 kids since at least 4 would die. That has changed, we live in a modern world but have a caveman subconscious that can't keep up.
Ive Been saying this for awhile, but I guess it got buried in ASS sperg.
SpoilerShow
Image

User avatar
veris leta facies
Posts: 1221
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2017 7:26 pm

Re: RIP Sweden v3.2

Post by veris leta facies » Fri Mar 01, 2019 12:42 pm

Poonoo wrote:
Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:11 pm
You can't go back to traditionalism though because capitalism got women out of the kitchen. Most jobs used to be manual labour so women didn't work, and without modern technology housework was a full time job along with the fact that people used to have 8 kids since at least 4 would die. That has changed, we live in a modern world but have a caveman subconscious that can't keep up.
I don't see capitalism itself breaking traditionalism, the importance of a nuclear family etc. Quite contrary, it's socialism. One could of course argue that socialist features (welfare, free education and healthcare and so on) develop and come out naturally in civilized western societys when they get wealthy enough via capitalism, whiteys are the most emphatic race after all and most westerners see pure laissez-faire capitalism as unethical.

But the most capitalist areas in the non-Western world, Hong Kong and Singapore, are very traditional. It's these socialist features in western countries that "frees" women from traditionalism, they don't need a man, government will take care of them with all sorts of gibs, if they want kids they'll have their excessive maternity leaves, child benefits and so on. Women in East Europe or in East Asia are kind of dependable of having a man if they want kids or if they want generally success in life. It's cultural pressure also, of course.

I don't know if this phenomenon is global, but at least in my country (and in the Nordic countries in general) the public sector (which is forever growing) is a major employer of women and it's filled with all kinds of sinecure jobs (they aren't called like that, but that's what they really are). Women generally can't compete for the most wanted jobs in the private sector with men as men generally are more aggressive, ambitious, relentless and smart. The way I see it, in a supremely capitalist society without the government gibs or worthless sinecure/welfare "jobs" there wouldn't be much other choice for the most women than traditionalism.
It's ok to be huwhite

User avatar
Pepsi Man
Posts: 1340
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2018 8:53 pm

Re: RIP Sweden v3.2

Post by Pepsi Man » Fri Mar 01, 2019 4:30 pm

Poonoo wrote:
Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:11 pm
Ragamuffin mentioned that men want companionship so this shit won't take off, but if they feel women in general aren't offering that in the far future (sex robots being realistic enough in movement are way off, posters here will be all either insanely old or dying) they'll just resort to the bots since they'll be better for just the sex.
She's completely right and the, "realistic movement," completely misses the point. Sex robots won't take off any more than fleshlights did. You might keep one for when you're having a lonely night while your partner is away (though the robot will be more difficult to hide) but the mythical Real Vagina will still be the holy grail and men will still be pining after it.

Having sex with a woman is far more complex than having sex with... anything artificial. The only way they could simulate sex with a real woman would be to create complex artificial life.

In short, feminists getting mad about them are retarded, but thinking men will replace women with them on any appreciable level is also retarded.
Guest wrote:Poopy Man

User avatar
veris leta facies
Posts: 1221
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2017 7:26 pm

Re: RIP Sweden v3.2

Post by veris leta facies » Fri Mar 01, 2019 4:43 pm

I'm not myself interested in sexrobots, but if crazy feminists protest something, it is reason enough to support it. Troll the feminists good and make some sexrobot which cries during the sex and says shit like: "Please no sir! I'm just sixteen!" :lol:
It's ok to be huwhite

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest