Page 4 of 4
Re: "Sanctuary" States/Cities Being Targeted by the DoJ
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 2:46 am
by Pope Corky III
Poonoo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 2:22 am
Kugelfisch wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 7:05 pm
I think it also has to do with it having been illegal for too long so as to fester a cuntish culture.
I can get totally fucking smashed in a park if I want to. You generally don't do that above teenager age. The stoners smoke very openly now partially out of defiance. Had it been legal for decades it would be just as mundane as beer or even seen as lame. Especially since you wouldn't have so many rappers glorifying it.
Yeah, as shitty as it is initially I think over a generation it will die out and not be seen as a fucking lifestyle.
I also think this. Weed won't be "cool" anymore. Not to mention it will be much more expensive in states where its legal which will also thin out numbers.
Re: "Sanctuary" States/Cities Being Targeted by the DoJ
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 9:13 pm
by Guest
Back on topic, some judge ruled the guv can't deny money to sanctuary cities cause it's mean or something. Gave his verdict the same day two border guards were ambushed by illegals with rocks and one killed by having his head smashed in.
Re: "Sanctuary" States/Cities Being Targeted by the DoJ
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 9:54 pm
by Duwango
Guest wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 9:13 pm
Back on topic, some judge ruled the guv can't deny money to sanctuary cities cause it's mean or something. Gave his verdict the same day two border guards were ambushed by illegals with rocks and one killed by having his head smashed in.
9th Circuit court is pure unadulterated cancer. They can't defy federal immigration law anyway. This is what Hopey Changey legacy looks like.
Re: "Sanctuary" States/Cities Being Targeted by the DoJ
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:17 am
by da PAC Nigguh
Shit better improve as Trump gets more and more judicial vacancies filled. Media is crying because most of his picks for judges are white men. Boo hoo.
Re: "Sanctuary" States/Cities Being Targeted by the DoJ
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 2:15 pm
by Kugelfisch
Guest wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 9:13 pm
Back on topic, some judge ruled the guv can't deny money to sanctuary cities cause it's mean or something.
Are those the same idiots who vetoed the travel ban claiming the president couldn't order one when it's written quite clearly in black and white that he can?
Re: "Sanctuary" States/Cities Being Targeted by the DoJ
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 5:10 pm
by VoiceOfReasonPast
But that would be mean.
Re: "Sanctuary" States/Cities Being Targeted by the DoJ
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:56 pm
by Charlar
They don't know what being mean really means