It's probably not true because of the logistical side. Hypothetical money to end world hunger is useless if you can't get it where it needs to go for the people at the end to actually eat some fucking food.
I don't trust most charity organizations. The majority pay their heads like 6+ figures a year. Why? Motherfucking why? Why do you cunts need ridiculous money to redistribute resources to poor people?
Re: Black Lives Matter
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2018 11:14 pm
by da PAC Nigguh
I don't buy the "you can feed a child for just 50 cents a day" bullshit, either.
Re: Black Lives Matter
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2018 12:46 am
by Guest
Why would you ever want to feed niggers.
Re: Black Lives Matter
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2018 12:49 am
by Osterzone
Bezos is worth almost double that now, at 154 billion.
I don't trust most charity organizations. The majority pay their heads like 6+ figures a year. Why? Motherfucking why? Why do you cunts need ridiculous money to redistribute resources to poor people?
I also have to sometimes wonder how serious these organizations are with their mission of eradicated the reason for their amazing income.
One of the most revolting things I've ever seen. I'd rather be a cannibal than eat dirt.
>have all day to make sand cookies
>don't have time to work a farm
Alright, then.
Re: Black Lives Matter
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2018 11:51 pm
by rabidtictac
Speaking of which, I don't think chickens cost very much to keep or have very big requirements for nutrition. They spend all day making dirt cookies but can't build a chicken coop? Even a single egg a day would beat the pants off a dirt cookie.