Victoria: Australia's Shame

Shitpost about Trump, SJWs, Islam and everything else about politics except economics, because that's too hard
User avatar
mad bum
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 15348
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 11:15 pm
Location: In spoony's rape dungeon

Re: Victoria: Australia's Shame

Post by mad bum » Fri Oct 30, 2020 3:08 am

Image
Image
SpoilerShow
phpBB [video]

User avatar
Guest

Re: Victoria: Australia's Shame

Post by Guest » Fri Oct 30, 2020 3:15 am

Voices gathering his army of perverts as we speak.

User avatar
Moe Bitches
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 4035
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2019 4:54 am
Location: Hell on Earth
Contact:

Re: Victoria: Australia's Shame

Post by Moe Bitches » Fri Oct 30, 2020 3:45 am

da PAC Nigguh wrote:
Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:06 am
Shit like this is why satire is dead in currentyear.

User avatar
VoiceOfReasonPast
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 30960
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm

Re: Victoria: Australia's Shame

Post by VoiceOfReasonPast » Fri Oct 30, 2020 6:29 am

Guest wrote:
Fri Oct 30, 2020 3:15 am
Voices gathering his army of perverts as we speak.
You think I care about Down Under?
If anything, this means more hentai for the European market 8-)
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly

4 wikia: static -> vignette

User avatar
veris leta facies
Posts: 2368
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2017 7:26 pm

Re: Victoria: Australia's Shame

Post by veris leta facies » Fri Oct 30, 2020 12:08 pm

Commonwealth's gonna commonwealth.
Taxation is theft
Greed is good
Laissez-faire über alles

User avatar
Poonoo
Bureaucrat
Posts: 6259
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2017 1:16 pm

Re: Victoria: Australia's Shame

Post by Poonoo » Fri Oct 30, 2020 1:00 pm

mad bum wrote:
Fri Oct 30, 2020 3:08 am
Image
As if most people aren't getting their hentai for free online anyway. :lol:

Apparently Cuties is fine though and was approved by our ratings board. I wish aussies would stop shitposting for two god damn seconds and stop being so politically apathetic for once to stop shit like this from happening. No country embraces it's Bread and Circus quite like Australia.
Old Black Man wrote:
Wed Nov 27, 2019 9:11 pm
Also Lupa’s grandmother? Please, we know that hag was alive and well back then. She’s like the dude from Highlander, only a cunt.
Image

User avatar
rabidtictac
Posts: 16092
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:25 pm

Re: Victoria: Australia's Shame

Post by rabidtictac » Fri Oct 30, 2020 1:29 pm

The girl on the left in that image could be any age, from 14 to 30. She hardly has a childish body. The cuties shit was way more pedo-friendly than those drawings.

Not to say japs aren't pedos because they are. But unlike cuties, no actual children are exploited when they draw their pedoshit.
RAPEMAN wrote:
Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:42 pm
>liberal: ban x
>trump: yeah ban x
>liberal: no bro x is awesome

User avatar
Guest

Re: Victoria: Australia's Shame

Post by Guest » Fri Oct 30, 2020 2:03 pm

Remember, in current year women in their 30s are innocent child-like beings still capable of being groomed.

User avatar
VoiceOfReasonPast
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 30960
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm

Re: Victoria: Australia's Shame

Post by VoiceOfReasonPast » Fri Oct 30, 2020 3:58 pm

It's all about the age you identify as, really.
Poonoo wrote:
Fri Oct 30, 2020 1:00 pm
Apparently Cuties is fine though and was approved by our ratings board.
Of course, mate. Cuties is art - very much unlike this series of 2D art presented in quick sequence to fool the human eye into seeing moving images.
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly

4 wikia: static -> vignette

User avatar
RAPEMAN
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 5487
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:22 pm

Re: Victoria: Australia's Shame

Post by RAPEMAN » Fri Oct 30, 2020 7:33 pm

>ban cartoon porn depicting fictional children
>import millions of middle eastern child fuckers

I'm glad Australia has its priorities straight. Seriously, banning porn to prevent the creation of sex offenders is akin to banning violent video games to stop mass shooters. I thought we've dealt with this line of logic in the early 2000s. God I hate the Anglo-sphere.
VoiceOfReasonPast wrote:
Fri Oct 30, 2020 3:58 pm
Of course, mate. Cuties is art - very much unlike this series of 2D art presented in quick sequence to fool the human eye into seeing moving images.
Cuties was made by a female nigger so it is OK. Can you imagine if a white male tried this shit? I've actually seen the argument that because the film was made by a female it is OK. You know, because women cannot be sex-pests.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests