Re: Shitlib debates: Clown world 2020
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 10:56 am
You could buy like ten blu-rays from Japan.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Mar 21, 2020 11:43 pmThink of all the animu merchandise you could buy with that much money.
RIP to the only man that was as sick as Spoony claimed to be...
http://forum2.deadhorseinterchange.net/
http://forum2.deadhorseinterchange.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=965
You could buy like ten blu-rays from Japan.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Mar 21, 2020 11:43 pmThink of all the animu merchandise you could buy with that much money.
She'll find out how much of a right housing is and should be once the starving impoverished working class kill her and take her house.Poonoo wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2020 11:12 pm>the shit we are in now is exactly the world I wanted
>this won't bite me in the ass when unemployment skyrockets
What a stupid cunt. Even shutting shit down like this for a few months is going to destroy the economy and she thinks this is the way thing should be forever? I knew she was dumb but god damn.
Anyone who clings to the historically untrue and thoroughly immoral doctrine that violence never settles anything I would advise to conjure up the ghosts of Napoleon Bonaparte and the Duke of Wellington and let them debate it. The ghost of Hitler could referee and the jury might well be the Dodo, the Great Auk, and the Passenger Pigeon. Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor, and the contrary opinion is wishful thinking at its worst. Breeds that forget this basic truth have always paid for it with their lives and their freedoms.
Ah yes, [life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness]... Life? What 'right' to life has a man who is drowning in the Pacific? The ocean will not hearken to his cries. What 'right' to life has a man who must die to save his children? If he chooses to save his own life, does he do so as a matter of 'right'? If two men are starving and cannibalism is the only alternative to death, which man's right is 'unalienable'? And is it 'right'? As to liberty, the heroes who signed the great document pledged themselves to buy liberty with their lives. Liberty is never unalienable; it must be redeemed regularly with the blood of patriots or it always vanishes. Of all the so-called natural human rights that have ever been invented, liberty is least likely to be cheap and is never free of cost. The third 'right'?—the 'pursuit of happiness'? It is indeed unalienable but it is not a right; it is simply a universal condition which tyrants cannot take away nor patriots restore. Cast me into a dungeon, burn me at the stake, crown me king of kings, I can 'pursue happiness' as long as my brain lives—but neither gods nor saints, wise men nor subtle drugs, can ensure that I will catch it.
>implying it gets better