Page 45 of 123

Re: Star Dreck

Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2020 5:42 pm
by VoiceOfReasonPast
Kinda makes sense if you think about it. How are we ever going to get from Current Year to Star Trek Utopia if WW3 keeps taking its sweet-ass time?

Re: Star Dreck

Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 7:50 am
by CuckTurdginson

Re: Star Dreck

Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 3:17 pm
by da PAC Nigguh
Better than what we have now, yes. I don't believe it myself, though.

Re: Star Dreck

Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 5:54 pm
by VoiceOfReasonPast
I like to think that things can only go up under different ownership, but I'm not getting my hopes up.

Re: Star Dreck

Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 5:57 pm
by Keith Chegwin
Never gunna happen. ViacomCBS are probably going through hell to untangle the mess that is the Star Trek licence. They're not going to go and create yet another Star Trek licence for MacFarlane to play with

Re: Star Dreck

Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 5:59 pm
by VoiceOfReasonPast
He can always try to adapt the Star Fleet Battles license.

Re: Star Dreck

Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 7:49 pm
by Guest
Not to give Macfarlane any credit or anything, but if he were to buy the Star Trek license, he could just easily decanonize the entire Kelvin Timeline + associated post-Enterprise canon as a "What If" scenario (similar to what Disney did with the old Star Wars EU) as an ultimate middle finger to JJ, Lindelof, and Kurtzman & start off fresh with something in line with the quality of TNG (post-Season 1) and Deep Space Nine.

Re: Star Dreck

Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 7:58 pm
by Keith Chegwin
A new licence would naturally ignore that stuff anyway

Re: Star Dreck

Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2020 8:17 am
by CuckTurdginson
There is something endearing about spending your millions on getting custody of that nerd property you've always loved that makes me want to believe the rumor.
Plus it would probably make the blue checkmarks livid - despite being a libshit himself, SJWs hate Macfarlane.

Re: Star Dreck

Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2020 8:21 am
by Keith Chegwin
They might well give it to him at some point. He's done a better job, as a parody, of making a Star Trek that people know and love than the people they gave it to make an official continuation. I just don't see them selling it to him, with the licence situation and rights being such a mess and with the re-merger designed, at least in part, to fix all of that.