Re: South Park
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2017 2:45 pm
Couldn't they have just pulled a Saddam Hussein and used the actual Trump? Or was that epic story arc of Garrison's election campaign really worth those 4-8 years?
Dead Horse Interchange
RIP to the only man that was as sick as Spoony claimed to be...
http://forum2.deadhorseinterchange.net/
South Park
http://forum2.deadhorseinterchange.net/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=493
Page 7 of 20
Re: South Park
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:07 pm
Independent of outcome of the actual election they should've had Trump win anyway. Actual Trump, not Garrison. Hell, especially if Clinton had won they should've had Trump be president. What fucking morons to bank that hard on the biggest loser in politics.
Re: South Park
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:17 pm
I don't get how they WOULDN'T want Mr. Garrison as President. The character was stale for a while and this opens up so many possibilities.rabidtictac wrote: ↑Sat Sep 23, 2017 2:33 pmThey thought they could turn Garrison into Trump and then have Trump lose the election, then move Garrison back to south park as a normal person again to use in future episodes.Keith Chegwin wrote: ↑Sat Sep 23, 2017 7:21 amWatched the latest episode last night. A brief recap:
>Muh Drumpf
>Muh North Korea
>Muh other shit that was not funny and nobody cared about
I don't think I laughed a single time during the episode. Also, PC Principal has devolved into a bland, boring, uninspired shell of a character, and they're so afraid of Trump they won't even call Garrison by name even though Garrison, not Trump, is supposed to be the President.
Now they're locked in with Garrison as POTUS for 4 fucking years!That's hilarious! And if Trump wins again, they'll be forced to use him for another four years!
Remember that South Park often has used the president, whoever it happened to be, in their episodes. Whenever they do that now, they have to use Garrison! They can't use him for anything else because they wrote him as the Trump who actually became president! All this because they were SURE shillary would win!
What do you mean "unfunny"? That's fucking hilarious!
This may be the funniest south park has ever been. But the humor is all outside of the actual episodes. Matt and Trey were too bluepilled and they fucked their own writing staff for the next 4-8 years. I tip my bedora to that one. Trump 4d chess strikes again.
Re: South Park
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:52 pm
They're not talented enough to explore those possibilities. They might have been, years ago, but they aren't now. Not to mention any episode focusing on Garrison as not Trump might unintentionally make him look good. Keep in mind these are the guys who used sophistry to argue why their anti-poltical correctness is not the same as Trump's anti-political correctness, because to do otherwise would be to admit common cause with Donald Trump.Pope Corky III wrote: ↑Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:17 pmI don't get how they WOULDN'T want Mr. Garrison as President. The character was stale for a while and this opens up so many possibilities.
Re: South Park
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 12:06 pm
Trey and Matt seem to have genuine contempt or apathy for the show, their audience, or both. If they hate doing it or just can’t be bothered anymore, then they need to end it because it’s getting painful.
Re: South Park
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 2:17 pm
They won't, because money.Throne of Dysentery wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2017 12:06 pmTrey and Matt seem to have genuine contempt or apathy for the show, their audience, or both. If they hate doing it or just can’t be bothered anymore, then they need to end it because it’s getting painful.
I'm sure they do hate the show at this point. I'm sure they've hated it for many seasons now. But they've become the Simpsons they hated.
Re: South Park
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 2:28 pm
Money? They have enough money for two lifetimes at this point. Did no one just see me post that Comedy Central probably won't let them leave (blackmail, suing for breach of contract)?
They have enough money for two lifetimes at this point. Did no one just see me post that Comedy Central probably won't let them leave (blackmail, suing for breach of contract)?Re: South Park
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 6:43 pm
Did they ever say they hated the Simpsons? For any reason other than the Simpsons already did all their good ideas?
Rich people have a different standard of living to you and me. They need to keep in the money and the best way to do that is to get a regular TV show and draw a regular paycheque.Pope Corky III wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2017 2:28 pmMoney?
Re: South Park
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 8:05 pm
They had a shoutout to The Simpsons with an unnamed Bart Simpson character.
In the commentary track they said they like The Simpsons and King of the Hill, but they did hate Family Guy and Seth McFarlane's shows.
In the commentary track they said they like The Simpsons and King of the Hill, but they did hate Family Guy and Seth McFarlane's shows.
Re: South Park
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 9:39 pm
The getting old episode was proof of that. They can lie all they want and pretend it's all good but that episode was them venting their frustration at being stuck doing one thing.rabidtictac wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2017 2:17 pmThey won't, because money.Throne of Dysentery wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2017 12:06 pmTrey and Matt seem to have genuine contempt or apathy for the show, their audience, or both. If they hate doing it or just can’t be bothered anymore, then they need to end it because it’s getting painful.
I'm sure they do hate the show at this point. I'm sure they've hated it for many seasons now. But they've become the Simpsons they hated.
They are like internet nobodies, except they actually made good money.