Re: Movie Thread
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 4:50 pm
Star Trek IV was also a big hit and made more than II and III, so that may have enticed Paramount to provide a bigger budget for V.
RIP to the only man that was as sick as Spoony claimed to be...
http://forum2.deadhorseinterchange.net/
http://forum2.deadhorseinterchange.net/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=9
Those guys made the most of what little money they had and did a pretty good job of it with 2-4 and 6. Shatner just got way too unrealistically ambitious with 5 and should have been reeled in much earlier in production.Keith Chegwin wrote: ↑Fri Apr 20, 2018 4:37 pmThat is correct, I forgot about The Motion Picture. However, Star Trek V did cost more to make than Star Treks II, III and IV and, unlike The Motion Picture (which made something like $130 million on a nearly $50 million budget), Star Trek V just barely missed doubling its budget.Liar Revealed wrote: ↑Fri Apr 20, 2018 3:37 pmDo you have a source for that? As far as I know, the first movie cost the most to make. Paramount was pissed off at how badly ST:TMP movie did, so all the sequels had severely reduced budgets.
All I remember is that it was strangely boring for a buddy cop action flick starring Will Smith and Martin Lawrence.Keith Chegwin wrote: ↑Thu Apr 19, 2018 2:52 pmAll I remember from Bad Boys I is that it was shit, but Tea Leoni was quite hot.
I have a soft spot for the first movie as well. Not in my Top 3, but pretty cool when I'm in the right mood.da PAC Nigguh wrote: ↑Thu Apr 19, 2018 4:16 pmStar Trek: The Motionless Picture is actually really good, despite its agonizingly slow pace at times (the film starts with a starfield that plays for a couple minutes before the opening credits even begin, setting the tone for every scene in the film).
The concept of V'Ger is one of the most interesting ideas to come out of Star Trek, though. An antagonist who isn't really bad, just a machine attempting to complete its purpose as it comprehended it. It's probably the most "hard Sci-Fi" stuff in the franchise, in the films at least.
From what I remember the plot was just some sitcom mistaken identity plot, which would be tedious enough in a half hour sitcom but this movie was like 90 minutes long, maybe longer.VoiceOfReasonPast wrote: ↑Fri Apr 20, 2018 8:58 pmAll I remember is that it was strangely boring for a buddy cop action flick starring Will Smith and Martin Lawrence.
Martin Lawrence is the AIDS Moby Max Landis of comedians.VoiceOfReasonPast wrote: ↑Fri Apr 20, 2018 8:58 pmAll I remember is that it was strangely boring for a buddy cop action flick starring Will Smith and Martin Lawrence.