Pornless year, doable or not?

Talk about the internet itself instead of people.
User avatar
BlueberryRagamuffin
Goon
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:45 pm

Re: Pornless year, doable or not?

Post by BlueberryRagamuffin » Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:20 am

You guys are super cynical. There are definitely men who find women annoying and only associate with them for sex, just as there are women who feel the same way about men. But they aren't the majority. I see older couples who have lost their youthful libido and beauty all the time. They stay together not just for convenience but because they're companions.
When I was a kid my favorite relative was Uncle Caveman. After school we'd all go play in his cave, and every once in a while he would eat one of us. It wasn't until later that I found out that Uncle Caveman was a bear.

User avatar
Keith Chegwin
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 6670
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 9:42 am
Location: In jail for tax evasion

Re: Pornless year, doable or not?

Post by Keith Chegwin » Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:25 am

This thread needs to be razed to the ground
VoiceOfReasonPast wrote:
Sat Jan 06, 2018 8:31 am
Doki doki is what you get in your kokoro when everything goes according to keikaku and senpai finally notices you.

User avatar
rabidtictac
Posts: 11012
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:25 pm

Re: Pornless year, doable or not?

Post by rabidtictac » Fri Feb 15, 2019 7:16 am

Kugelfisch wrote:
Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:14 am
BlueberryRagamuffin wrote:
Thu Feb 14, 2019 3:09 am
Men will always desire female companionship.
Men's companionship goes like this: Dog>other pet>male friend>being alone>nothing>nothing>nothing>child>noththingx50>woman.
The graph checks out. Not counting family imo because that's different.

Ask yourself how many men out there really share any significant interests with the woman they're with. Just look at DSP and Khet for a great example. That shit is downright normal. Plenty of women are with guys because they provide resources and the men are with the woman because she provides pussy/validation. Watching DSP and Khet talk is like looking at two Datas trying to download human emotions.

Men desire female companionship... That's true if you mean it as a euphemism for sex. Not counting 70+ year old men obviously because at that point, you need a caretaker and if you have a woman at that age, it's probably more comfortable to just remain with them than break up. That's assuming you stopped caring about sex, which I'm 100% certain plenty of men still haven't given up on at that age.

I've known a lot of people in long-term relationships and I can't honestly say I ever noticed the two had much in common. Many of them were clearly only together because it was what they were used to, or because their religion prevented them from divorcing.

User avatar
Old Black Man
Posts: 2073
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:54 am

Re: Pornless year, doable or not?

Post by Old Black Man » Fri Feb 15, 2019 8:47 am

Keith Chegwin wrote:
Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:25 am
This thread needs to be razed to the ground
This thread was based around ASS fapping to gay porn, of course it needs to be razed.
Image

User avatar
AdorableOtter
Posts: 834
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 3:03 pm

Re: Pornless year, doable or not?

Post by AdorableOtter » Fri Feb 15, 2019 10:37 am

DHIP! Put your Hentais down!!

Image
BlueberryRagamuffin wrote:
Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:20 am
You guys are super cynical. There are definitely men who find women annoying and only associate with them for sex, just as there are women who feel the same way about men. But they aren't the majority. I see older couples who have lost their youthful libido and beauty all the time. They stay together not just for convenience but because they're companions.
And the sky is blue. I really don't understand what kind of point you're trying to make by picking up extreme cases like socially dysfunctional doll loving weirdos.
If you're interested in what kind of factors affect birth rate, just look into it. Some people love to bring up modern Japan or Byzantine Italy to point out how economy something something to simplify the matter, but it's actually more complicated and difficult subject.

User avatar
AngrySpoonySnob
Posts: 2589
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 4:36 pm

Re: Pornless year, doable or not?

Post by AngrySpoonySnob » Fri Feb 15, 2019 11:18 am

Old Black Man wrote:
Fri Feb 15, 2019 8:47 am
Keith Chegwin wrote:
Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:25 am
This thread needs to be razed to the ground
This thread was based around ASS fapping to gay porn, of course it needs to be razed.
Dont put your fantasy on me as fact dirtbag.
Respect my gangsta
- Wackashi Snitchnine

User avatar
AngrySpoonySnob
Posts: 2589
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 4:36 pm

Re: Pornless year, doable or not?

Post by AngrySpoonySnob » Fri Feb 15, 2019 11:20 am

Kugelfisch wrote:
Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:14 am
BlueberryRagamuffin wrote:
Thu Feb 14, 2019 3:09 am
Men will always desire female companionship.
Lot's of gems to pick out from this thread but this one is the most hilarious. Men's companionship goes like this: Dog>other pet>male friend>being alone>nothing>nothing>nothing>child>noththingx50>woman.
Female "companionship" is only there for very limited reasons. It's either because he wants to fuck her 9/10 cases, he thinks he'll be more likely to fuck somebody he desires 1/10 cases and only incidentally and not worth listing by chance where neither cases apply. Do note that the latter chance still applies slightly.

There's no actual companionship between a woman and a man. Companionship is between two parties that respect each other and you can't respect what you'd ever fuck.
There's only one kind of man that thinks highly of female companionship and only because they've never experienced it: Incels.

These days sure, thats not how it was though and definitaly not how it supposed to be. You cant have companionship with modern woman because 90% are not real women anymore. And no for once i dont mean trannies lol, I mean theyve lost all the qualities of being a woman and mother.
Not sure where you get you cant respect what you fuck from but I guess thats the same as you needing to like an animal you eat lol.
Or are you differentiating between fucking and lovemaking?
Respect my gangsta
- Wackashi Snitchnine

User avatar
Credo in Deum
Posts: 496
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2018 7:51 pm

Re: Pornless year, doable or not?

Post by Credo in Deum » Fri Feb 15, 2019 6:11 pm

BlueberryRagamuffin wrote:
Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:20 am
You guys are super cynical. There are definitely men who find women annoying and only associate with them for sex, just as there are women who feel the same way about men. But they aren't the majority. I see older couples who have lost their youthful libido and beauty all the time. They stay together not just for convenience but because they're companions.
Says the person running around r/GenderCritical
Welcome to Reddit's most active feminist community! This is a women-centered, radical feminist subreddit to discuss gender from a critical, feminist perspective.

Feminism is the movement to liberate women from patriarchy. We stand up for the rights of women to control our own bodies as individuals and to control women-only spaces as a class.

Women are adult human females. We do not believe that men can become women by 'feeling' like women. We do not condone the erasure of females and female-only spaces, the silencing of critical thinking, the denial of biological reality and of sex-based oppression. We oppose the 'cotton ceiling' and the pressure on lesbians to have sex with men. We resist efforts to limit women's reproductive autonomy. We condemn the men who exploit and abuse women in prostitution and pornography.

"Women do not decide at some point in adulthood that they would like other people to understand them to be women, because being a woman is not an ‘identity.’ Women’s experience does not resemble that of men who adopt the ‘gender identity’ of being female or being women in any respect. The idea of ‘gender identity’ disappears biology and all the experiences that those with female biology have of being reared in a caste system based on sex." - Sheila Jeffreys, Gender Hurts
Women destroyed classical society with the power of the state. Now they cry about it, call it feminist analysis and keep going with more liberation. I wonder how much more society needs to get liberated until you realize that your ideology is shit. Learn to practice individualism and not state collectivism.

Just look HOW FREE you have become. Everyone in the workforce and sustaining the traditional family model has become impossible. If a man provides for you within the communist nihilistic society we have today it is pure liberation but in a patriarchal society it was pure oppression because you couldn't have your cake and eat it too. Good luck trying to become the sole bread provider for the other gender as a women when you are physically weaker.

>Sheila Jeffreys
SpoilerShow
Sheila Jeffreys (born 13 May 1948) is a former professor of political science at the University of Melbourne. An English expatriate and lesbian feminist scholar, she is best known for her analysis of the history and politics of human sexuality.

Jeffreys' argument that the "sexual revolution" on men's terms contributed less to women's freedom than to their continued oppression has commanded respect and attracted intense criticism. She argues that women suffering pain in pursuit of beauty is a form of submission to patriarchal sadism, that transsexuals reproduce oppressive gender roles and mutilate their bodies through sex reassignment surgery, and that lesbian culture has been negatively affected by emulating the sexist influence of the gay male subculture of dominant/submissive sexuality.
“Male domination, and the low and stigmatised status of women, cause teenage girls to engage in punishment of their bodies through eating disorders and self-mutilation. There is increasing evidence that woman-hating Western cultures are toxic to girls and very harmful to their mental health. It is, perhaps, not surprising, therefore, that there seem to be some girls baling out and seeking to upgrade their status.”
“Radical feminist theorists do not seek to make gender a bit more flexible, but to eliminate it. They are gender abolitionists, and understand gender to provide the framework and rationale for male dominance. In the radical feminist approach, masculinity is the behaviour of the male ruling class and femininity is the behaviour of the subordinate class of women. Thus gender can have no place in the egalitarian future that feminism aims to create.”
“There should be no necessary contradiction between recognizing the harms women suffer from male dominance as well as their courage and resourcefulness in dealing with them. Otherwise feminist critique might have to be abandoned altogether on the grounds that it is insulting to women.”
“To clarify the dilemma women have about sexual enthusiasm for men, it is helpful to contrast it with men's situation. It is unlikely in the extreme that men will have experienced actual sexual violence from women or its threat. Men do not live in cultures where the degradation and brutalisation of men at the hands of women is the stuff of pornography, entertainment and advertising. Men do not live with the consciousness that they are being hunted by women who would take sexual delight in dismembering them simply on account of their gender. They do not live in a society in which their degradation through sex is the dominant theme of the culture. They do not have to approach women sexually in fear or with distressing images or associations with their own oppression. The images they are likely to carry with them are those of women degraded and brutalised by men. In fact they are likely to have practised sexual arousal with such images, extensively, through pornography and fantasy. It is not surprising, then, that sexologists have identified women's 'inhibition' as the main sexual problem of this century. They have identified as healthy sexual feelings those which the male ruling class experiences and have chosen to avoid recognising the political reasons why women might feel differently.”
“Men's ideas about what women are have been formed from their ruling caste position, and have assigned women characteristics that would most advantage their masters, as well as justify men's rule over them. They do not represent 'truth' but have been promoted as if they were, with the backing of science and patriarchal views of biology.”
“Pornography as propaganda, according to feminist analysis, represents women as objects who love to be abused, and teaches men practices of degradation and abuse to carry out upon women.”
“Men's sexual freedom has depended, and still does to a large extent, upon their ownership of women's bodies. Men have bought, sold and traded women as things to be used. Women are still regularly raped in marriage, even though most Western countries have now changed their laws to recognize that wives have a right not to be raped. Women are still bought and sold in marriage in many countries, and in the vast majority of countries of the world their bodies are still legally owned by their husbands. In prostitution and pornography, the mail-order bride business and reproductive surrogacy, the international trade in women is a burgeoning industry. Men's ownership of women's bodies has been the substrate on which their idea of sexual freedom was born and given its meaning. This is why it includes the right to buy access to women, men, and children as an important way of demonstrating that freedom. At the base of men's sexual freedom agenda is the concept of the rights of the male individual. Pateman points out that women cannot gain recognition as individuals, since the very concept of the 'individual' is male.”
“Men have been adjudicating on what women are, and how they should behave, for millennia through the institutions of social control such as religion, the medical profession, psychoanalysis, the sex industry. Feminists have fought to remove the definition of what a woman is from these masculine institutions and develop their own understandings.”

User avatar
VoiceOfReasonPast
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 15657
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm

Re: Pornless year, doable or not?

Post by VoiceOfReasonPast » Fri Feb 15, 2019 6:13 pm

Kugelfisch wrote:
Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:14 am
Lot's of gems to pick out from this thread but this one is the most hilarious. Men's companionship goes like this: Dog>other pet>male friend>being alone>nothing>nothing>nothing>child>noththingx50>woman.
You forgot to put in "waifu>" at the front.
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly

Cucked in the name of Soy, Ye not complicit.

User avatar
ban
Posts: 787
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2017 9:32 pm
Location: Banana Islands, Butthort Street 666
Contact:

Re: Pornless year, doable or not?

Post by ban » Fri Feb 15, 2019 8:18 pm

Liar Revealed wrote:
Thu Feb 14, 2019 2:11 am
BlueberryRagamuffin wrote:
Sun Feb 10, 2019 10:07 pm
The workmanship is fantastic, but I don't understand the appeal of fucking a lifeless piece of plastic.
Don't many (most?) women have dildos and vibrators? This is basically the same thing.

There have been blow-up dolls and things like that for ages. I don't think the kind of guys that buy these sorts of things are very well adjusted. These are probably VERY awkward guys that could never find dates/girlfriends/wives.
I always wonder how these people hide these dolls so that visitors never stumble across them.

I know feminists are mad about these dolls and the future sexbots, but I really don't see why. So some low-status men that women never wanted in the first place will find some minor happiness. That's really worth getting mad and harassing them about.
I don't know dude. Somehow it has been accepted that dildos and vibrators can be five footlongs with spikes or dragon shapped and have women suck them on stream but some reject hikkineet of society(like me :lol: ) can't own a human shaped fleshlight and be private about it.

Shit, the only women that shouldbe ultra outraged by those porndolls should be the ultra plastic-uped, liposcutioned ones aka american bimbohoes that suck their sugar daddies dicks every friday and sucking his money every second of the day. And they are the ones that are most tightlipped about all that because they know dolls aren't a threat.
rabidtictac wrote:
Fri Feb 15, 2019 7:16 am
Kugelfisch wrote:
Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:14 am
BlueberryRagamuffin wrote:
Thu Feb 14, 2019 3:09 am
Men will always desire female companionship.
Men's companionship goes like this: Dog>other pet>male friend>being alone>nothing>nothing>nothing>child>noththingx50>woman.
The graph checks out. Not counting family imo because that's different.
It almost checks out. For weebs and lonely otakus, you need to put a mecha and a waifu(or a mecha waifu for the truly progressive ones) in front of the dog and then the waifu pillow before the male friend the rest checks out. :lol:
Assiman wrote:You know who else is never wrong? Ban.
poonoo wrote:You just got ban'd!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest