Rekieta Law

Whine and Bitch about people long after they become interesting to talk about
User avatar
Guest

Re: Rekieta Law

Post by Guest » Fri Dec 06, 2019 7:10 am

Nick said in his stream that he's going to do a video on COPPA, that FTC thing that all the YouTubers are freaking out about. The main point is that he said that they're all overreacting.

User avatar
mad bum
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 17989
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 11:15 pm
Location: In spoony's rape dungeon

Re: Rekieta Law

Post by mad bum » Fri Dec 06, 2019 7:33 am

No shit they're overreacting. BTW my youtube cropper for mp4's is fucking gay and went pay only, anyone have another site they use?

https://ytcropper.com/cropped/3B5dea04108075b
Image
SpoilerShow
phpBB [video]

User avatar
Some Sick Fuck
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 5308
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 7:10 am

Re: Rekieta Law

Post by Some Sick Fuck » Fri Dec 06, 2019 9:29 am

Guest wrote:
Fri Dec 06, 2019 7:10 am
Nick said in his stream that he's going to do a video on COPPA, that FTC thing that all the YouTubers are freaking out about. The main point is that he said that they're all overreacting.
Mini-boss shouldn't waste his time, he should focus on streaming and making money. If he makes such video, what's in that for him? Probably not money, because nobody will watch it, and as anybody with a functioning brain can guess, the jewtubers are obviously overreacting, because they are bunch of pussies that lost touch with real world, and because they can use it as yet another drama to make money, see Booger for example.
Image

Blessed are the shitposters, for they will be called children of the Sperg.

Dehbashi
Posts: 4120
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2019 3:48 am

Re: Rekieta Law

Post by Dehbashi » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:00 pm

Of course COPPA is not that big of a deal. From the FTC that is. It's pretty much tells people to use ratings for the internet just as rating boards for the rest of the entertainment industry.

What the FTC guy said which spergs like Chadtronic were whining about was that hey you creators make the videos not YouTube so obviously you are more responsible to make sure it follows the guidelines.

Heck I found from another lawyer YouTuber a few days ago that the FTC did update the 2 decade law a few years ago to adjust to the modern era. It flat out says that they know that anything made with kids products isn't only for kids do exemptions will be allowed for that.

Ironically all these assholes who bitch about YouTube are sucking their dicks because they put the blame on the FTC. Even though it is obvious they wanted to do another round of demonetizing channels but using the FTC as cover. This mess happened because YouTube wasn't following the law.
Last edited by Dehbashi on Fri Dec 06, 2019 6:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
VoiceOfReasonPast
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 48099
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm

Re: Rekieta Law

Post by VoiceOfReasonPast » Fri Dec 06, 2019 5:19 pm

They just love a good excuse to go "You have to support me even more now or I. Will. DIE!"
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly

4 wikia: static -> vignette

User avatar
Poonoo
Bureaucrat
Posts: 7057
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2017 1:16 pm

Re: Rekieta Law

Post by Poonoo » Fri Dec 13, 2019 10:49 am



Minor victory here, they tried to block Vic's appeal from happening and got denied. Doesn't mean a whole lot until the appeal is successful but it's something.
Old Black Man wrote:
Wed Nov 27, 2019 9:11 pm
Also Lupa’s grandmother? Please, we know that hag was alive and well back then. She’s like the dude from Highlander, only a cunt.
Image

User avatar
rabidtictac
Posts: 20433
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:25 pm

Re: Rekieta Law

Post by rabidtictac » Fri Dec 13, 2019 12:07 pm

Blocking an appeal would be omegalul levels of Vic getting owned. Of course they'll let him make an appeal. They'll let him make his appeal, the court will consider it and then they'll reject it.
RAPEMAN wrote:
Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:42 pm
>liberal: ban x
>trump: yeah ban x
>liberal: no bro x is awesome

Dehbashi
Posts: 4120
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2019 3:48 am

Re: Rekieta Law

Post by Dehbashi » Fri Dec 13, 2019 2:00 pm

The other side of a case can actually block someone from making an appeal to a higher court after the original case is over?

User avatar
VoiceOfReasonPast
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 48099
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm

Re: Rekieta Law

Post by VoiceOfReasonPast » Fri Dec 13, 2019 6:33 pm

2020 will be the YEAR OF VIC.
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly

4 wikia: static -> vignette

User avatar
Guest

Re: Rekieta Law

Post by Guest » Fri Dec 13, 2019 6:36 pm

Dehbashi wrote:
Fri Dec 13, 2019 2:00 pm
The other side of a case can actually block someone from making an appeal to a higher court after the original case is over?
I imagine they can argue the appeal has no merit. Very unlikely to work, but the lawyer gets paid for it so of course he'll advise to do it

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests