Fair enough - but he shouldn't have de-regulated news as well, I will argue for hours that repealing the Fairness Doctrine began the degeneration of the media.RAPEMAN wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:14 pmReagan essentially un-cucked children's TV by allowing it to be more capitalistic and less socialistic which gave these cancerous fuckers the shows they love to be nostalgic over. Ironic. The music industry was still heavily under scrutiny at that time though.pibbs wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:03 pmFCC used to mandate that TV programming had to have elements of education to them. Reagan said, "Nah. Have at it." Thus the cartoons that were just long toy ads was born. Transformers, GI Joe, He-man etc
You know, all the good shit.
What's this got to do with space raptors? Just like much of the character's motivations in this book, fuck you, that's what.
NCunt: Black Cocks Only
- CuckTurdginson
- Posts: 4305
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 5:19 pm
Re: NCunt: Black Cocks Only
ebin namefag wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 10:06 amI don't know when they divorced I just know that it's Brad's fault.
Re: NCunt: Black Cocks Only
In the lead up to the book release, she mentioned that there were parts she had to rewrite because while they made sense to her, the agent and publisher were confused. But I don't remember her mentioning an editor, or if she used Nella and Todd as alpha readers (regular people who read the early drafts and give feedback based on how the audience might respond).
Just as a quick glance, I'm reminded of the 'writers' I knew who didn't understand multiple drafts. They assume that the first draft is always the final and while they'll go back and fix some spelling mistakes or reword a sentence, they refuse to do full rewrites on sections that don't work because then that would lead to other parts needing a rewrite. And they can't comprehend rewriting an entire novel they just finished so they assume that that's just how it has to be.
This is one of the leading causes of writers block, they're trying to make the first draft perfect instead of throwing in some bullshit and fixing it later.
Just as a quick glance, I'm reminded of the 'writers' I knew who didn't understand multiple drafts. They assume that the first draft is always the final and while they'll go back and fix some spelling mistakes or reword a sentence, they refuse to do full rewrites on sections that don't work because then that would lead to other parts needing a rewrite. And they can't comprehend rewriting an entire novel they just finished so they assume that that's just how it has to be.
This is one of the leading causes of writers block, they're trying to make the first draft perfect instead of throwing in some bullshit and fixing it later.
Re: NCunt: Black Cocks Only
Can you imagine how she would have reacted if someone had used that phrase to her face?rabidtictac wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 1:29 amAlways kill your babies. Every writer has heard this at least once. Lindsay's book is the result of a self-indulgent tosser refusing to remove any of their trite bullshit before publication.
- rabidtictac
- Posts: 20447
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:25 pm
Re: NCunt: Black Cocks Only
The first draft is always shit. Whether you take 100 years to write it or bang it out in an afternoon, the first draft is always shit. That's why you plan for innumerable drafts and you enlist fresh eyes to look at your writing. Only smug cunts who think their shit doesn't stink would refuse a rewrite. So basically, Lindsay. Yes, rewrites are a lot of work. Yes, it takes a long time. Yes, it is worth it. You end up with a draft that you can be somewhat proud of, rather than an unpolished mess that reads like your private ego masturbation material.
I bet the first draft of the lord of the rings was shit too.
I bet the first draft of the lord of the rings was shit too.
- CuckTurdginson
- Posts: 4305
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 5:19 pm
Re: NCunt: Black Cocks Only
That's an old Hemingway motto - "the first draft is always shit."
Lindsay's good at editing her little videos - maybe she'd be ok editing someone else's shit, she's got too much of an ego for that, tho.
Lindsay's good at editing her little videos - maybe she'd be ok editing someone else's shit, she's got too much of an ego for that, tho.
ebin namefag wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 10:06 amI don't know when they divorced I just know that it's Brad's fault.
Re: NCunt: Black Cocks Only
Nah. News was always corrupt and liars. We just know it easier now. Seriously Walter Duranty of the New York Times won a Pulitzer in the 1930s for being a Soviet puppet and flat out denying the Holomdor in Ukraine.CuckTurdginson wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 1:38 amFair enough - but he shouldn't have de-regulated news as well, I will argue for hours that repealing the Fairness Doctrine began the degeneration of the media.RAPEMAN wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:14 pmReagan essentially un-cucked children's TV by allowing it to be more capitalistic and less socialistic which gave these cancerous fuckers the shows they love to be nostalgic over. Ironic. The music industry was still heavily under scrutiny at that time though.pibbs wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:03 pmFCC used to mandate that TV programming had to have elements of education to them. Reagan said, "Nah. Have at it." Thus the cartoons that were just long toy ads was born. Transformers, GI Joe, He-man etc
You know, all the good shit.
What's this got to do with space raptors? Just like much of the character's motivations in this book, fuck you, that's what.
We can go to the founding fathers as well and their attitude about journalism as well. Just because they out in freedom of the press doesn't mean that they believed that the media was truthful then. You should read what Benjamin Franklin said about the media. Fun stuff.
Re: NCunt: Black Cocks Only
According to Lindsay, she pays someone to edit her videos
- CuckTurdginson
- Posts: 4305
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 5:19 pm
Re: NCunt: Black Cocks Only
I didn't know that, guess not, then.
>they were always shit so the solution is less accountability.Dehbashi wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 3:26 amNah. News was always corrupt and liars. We just know it easier now. Seriously Walter Duranty of the New York Times won a Pulitzer in the 1930s for being a Soviet puppet and flat out denying the Holomdor in Ukraine.CuckTurdginson wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 1:38 amFair enough - but he shouldn't have de-regulated news as well, I will argue for hours that repealing the Fairness Doctrine began the degeneration of the media.RAPEMAN wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:14 pm
Reagan essentially un-cucked children's TV by allowing it to be more capitalistic and less socialistic which gave these cancerous fuckers the shows they love to be nostalgic over. Ironic. The music industry was still heavily under scrutiny at that time though.
We can go to the founding fathers as well and their attitude about journalism as well. Just because they out in freedom of the press doesn't mean that they believed that the media was truthful then. You should read what Benjamin Franklin said about the media. Fun stuff.
ebin namefag wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 10:06 amI don't know when they divorced I just know that it's Brad's fault.
- VoiceOfReasonPast
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 48134
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
Re: NCunt: Black Cocks Only
But at least the latter two still included PSAs. Can't be completely without "merit", I suppose.
But writing multiple drafts is hard work.
I heard that one was about penis rings.rabidtictac wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 2:10 amI bet the first draft of the lord of the rings was shit too.
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
Re: NCunt: Black Cocks Only
>fairness doctrineCuckTurdginson wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 3:51 am>they were always shit so the solution is less accountability.
>accountability
You realise that, for most networks, their way of meeting fairness doctrine obligations was to get some 'Fox News Liberal' (or 'CNN Conservative' if that's a term) on to pretend to argue the other side. For fuck's sake, most of the people who want the fairness doctrine back are Democrat shitbags like Pelosi and the reason they want it back is because they're afraid of fucking Breitbart and conservative talk radio.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 61 guests