Mathew "Film Bald" Buck

Whine and Bitch about people long after they become interesting to talk about
Post Reply
User avatar
MegaNigger
Blackpill Merchant
Posts: 9232
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 5:52 pm
Contact:

Re: Mathew "Film Brain" Buck

Post by MegaNigger » Sat Sep 16, 2017 3:22 pm

Just. Fucking. SHAVE IT.
-The user formerly known as CIANigger

User avatar
Charlar
DHI's Resident Pussy
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 6:11 pm

Re: Mathew "Film Brain" Buck

Post by Charlar » Sat Sep 16, 2017 3:35 pm

Would it be less bad if when he has no more hair he wore a kippah?
-On the internet, everyone end up being Spoony or Tim Buckley
-All fanbases are shit
-Most people had, have and will have shit tastes

User avatar
MegaNigger
Blackpill Merchant
Posts: 9232
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 5:52 pm
Contact:

Re: Mathew "Film Brain" Buck

Post by MegaNigger » Sat Sep 16, 2017 3:36 pm

Charlar wrote:
Sat Sep 16, 2017 3:35 pm
Would it be less bad if when he has no more hair he wore a kippah?
He'd at least look like a put together homosexual man.
-The user formerly known as CIANigger

User avatar
Charlar
DHI's Resident Pussy
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 6:11 pm

Re: Mathew "Film Brain" Buck

Post by Charlar » Sat Sep 16, 2017 5:12 pm

CIANIgger wrote:
Sat Sep 16, 2017 3:36 pm
Charlar wrote:
Sat Sep 16, 2017 3:35 pm
Would it be less bad if when he has no more hair he wore a kippah?
He'd at least look like a put together homosexual man.
Well that'd be an upgrade from the child molester look he has now
-On the internet, everyone end up being Spoony or Tim Buckley
-All fanbases are shit
-Most people had, have and will have shit tastes

sigh
Posts: 470
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 5:48 am
Contact:

Re: Mathew "Film Brain" Buck

Post by sigh » Sat Sep 16, 2017 6:57 pm


> content must be solid if no one talks about anything but something as superficial as that.
> done four reviews in 2 weeks and none seem to have had much of an audience.

solid reasoning there mate, I could deduce different things from that. Maybe the only people who watch your shit are people who complain about your baldness If you are getting less views and still have people talking about your hair?
Maybe the film is just shit? As far as I heard it's some pretentious 3edgy5me movie, so it's possible audience would reject it.
Though it's funny when people say RT are shit and have 'incorrect' scores they would say that people are just salty. They do the same if a different agregator gives a low score for a movie they enjoy.

Just Some Random Guy
Posts: 556
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 12:16 am
Contact:

Re: Mathew "Film Brain" Buck

Post by Just Some Random Guy » Sat Sep 16, 2017 7:31 pm

Getting an F grade on CinemaScore is actually really, really hard to do. Consider the fact that most of those really bad Seltzer and Friedberg movies didn't get below a C-.

User avatar
Some Sick Fuck
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 5308
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 7:10 am
Contact:

Re: Mathew "Film Brain" Buck

Post by Some Sick Fuck » Sat Sep 16, 2017 7:43 pm

I wonder if the sexual predator formerly known as Film Brain cheats the patreon by re-releasing his old shit videos (he's been doing that a lot on youtube, going the Spoony route). If not, then I have no idea how he can still support himself just from making the videos, that can't be the only thing he's doing.
Image

Blessed are the shitposters, for they will be called children of the Sperg.

Just Some Random Guy
Posts: 556
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 12:16 am
Contact:

Re: Mathew "Film Brain" Buck

Post by Just Some Random Guy » Sat Sep 16, 2017 7:57 pm

Looking a bit more into mother! and reviews on it, from what I can tell the reason a lot of people are so souring over it is the marketing. It pitches itself as some kind of mainstream horror film when it's really an arthouse film that just happens to have a few horror elements. So people think they're seeing a horror movie, then end up with something totally different, which naturally irritates them considerably. Most likely the studio did it that way because they figured "who cares if people are angry? They've already paid, so ha!"

User avatar
Kugelfisch
Gesichert Rechtsradikal
Posts: 51146
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:36 pm
Contact:

Re: Mathew "Film Brain" Buck

Post by Kugelfisch » Sat Sep 16, 2017 9:15 pm

pibbs wrote:
Sat Sep 16, 2017 3:08 pm
drisko wrote:
Sat Sep 16, 2017 10:01 am
Yep, totally solid kahntent from Buck.
It's because you look like a 45 year old pedo.
No one wants to look at that. Your fans told you to do something about it but you raged like a 14 year old girl. Now your audience has left.
Shallow? Yes.
But its a visual medium you tool.
Crazy how people who put down in the job field on their tax return "faggot who makes videos for the internet" haven't gotten that yet.
Look at popular YT channels. I mean the really popular ones. The girls look good, the guys look good and come off as people a teenager would like to hang out with. Unless you do something extraordinary that is really interesting or entertaining to watch, people are going to care a lot about how you look and if they'd want something to do with you IRL.
It's just as baffling as high up execs not getting that kids don't want to watch kids but rather young adults that are allowed the things they want, like a pretty girlfriend/handsome boyfriend, their own place, being allowed to drink and a car.
SpoilerShow
Image
Stolzmonat > White Boy Summer

User avatar
da PAC Nigguh
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 6713
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 1:06 am
Contact:

Re: Mathew "Film Brain" Buck

Post by da PAC Nigguh » Sat Sep 16, 2017 10:33 pm

At least he's willing to consider that his shit content is the reason for his failing channel instead of trying to blame it all on PewDiePie and the KKK.
Is Spoony dead yet?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 17 guests