Feminism and SJW's in general

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Feminism and SJW's in general

Re: Feminism and SJW's in general

by Guest » Mon Oct 21, 2019 12:29 am

Keith Chegwin wrote:
Sun Oct 20, 2019 12:19 pm
Of all the words they could be called to complain about, they choose 'bossy'. Not 'cunt' or something similar
Saying cunt would trigger them because its an actual thing people say.
Also it would just give Australians incentive to be themselves.

Re: Feminism and SJW's in general

by Keith Chegwin » Sun Oct 20, 2019 12:19 pm

Of all the words they could be called to complain about, they choose 'bossy'. Not 'cunt' or something similar

Re: Feminism and SJW's in general

by Kugelfisch » Sun Oct 20, 2019 12:15 pm

Guest wrote:
Sun Oct 20, 2019 2:14 am
"ban bossy" is the worst campaign ever.
That shit's still going on? I thought they embarrassed themselves enough when it came out.

Re: Feminism and SJW's in general

by Guest » Sun Oct 20, 2019 2:14 am

"ban bossy" is the worst campaign ever.

Re: Feminism and SJW's in general

by VoiceOfReasonPast » Sun Sep 29, 2019 5:12 pm

I guess they happened the other way around, now that I think about it...

Re: Feminism and SJW's in general

by veris leta facies » Sun Sep 29, 2019 4:31 pm

VoiceOfReasonPast wrote:
Sun Sep 29, 2019 3:04 pm
Not limiting chancellors a term limit was probably the biggest mistake after the reunification. They all turn into human-shaped cancer at the end.
You mean the reunification was the biggest mistake and no limits for chancellors terms was the second biggest?

Re: Feminism and SJW's in general

by VoiceOfReasonPast » Sun Sep 29, 2019 3:04 pm

Not limiting chancellors a term limit was probably the biggest mistake after the reunification. They all turn into human-shaped cancer at the end.

Re: Feminism and SJW's in general

by Kugelfisch » Sun Sep 29, 2019 1:07 pm

VoiceOfReasonPast wrote:
Sun Sep 29, 2019 6:22 am
They probably also try to incite a bit of panic, since people glued onto the throne rarely ends well for anyone.

What they fail to mention is that this trick only really works if that despot's party has such a huge majority that they can pretty much do whatever.
So basically Angela Merkel.

Re: Feminism and SJW's in general

by VoiceOfReasonPast » Sun Sep 29, 2019 6:22 am

But it fuels their narrative of him being a power-hungry despot trying to swindle his way into extra terms, like several nice fellows on the African and Asian continents. They probably also try to incite a bit of panic, since people glued onto the throne rarely ends well for anyone.

What they fail to mention is that this trick only really works if that despot's party has such a huge majority that they can pretty much do whatever.

Re: Feminism and SJW's in general

by Keith Chegwin » Sun Sep 29, 2019 12:26 am

It's incredible how a shitlib will take completely seriously something everyone else understands to be a joke, in this case Trump saying they owe him an extra two terms

Top