What is it about CA INs?

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: What is it about CA INs?

Re: What is it about CA INs?

by Sieg Zeon » Mon Nov 23, 2020 1:49 am

Newhalf wrote:
Sun Nov 22, 2020 8:10 pm
Makes me wonder if some of the CA INs who are faced with complete obscurity would still have a more healthy fan base if CtC had never happened.
Looking at you film bald..
Leeching off Doge really helped some people get into the dim limelight of being a mediocre IN who would normally never have broken even a hundred subscribers or so.
Some of them really did dig their own graves with that one.

Re: What is it about CA INs?

by Kugelfisch » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:52 am

Film Bald wouldn't benefit unless he kept making the one series of his people actually cared for.

Re: What is it about CA INs?

by Newhalf » Sun Nov 22, 2020 8:10 pm

Makes me wonder if some of the CA INs who are faced with complete obscurity would still have a more healthy fan base if CtC had never happened.
Looking at you film bald..
Leeching off Doge really helped some people get into the dim limelight of being a mediocre IN who would normally never have broken even a hundred subscribers or so.

Re: What is it about CA INs?

by Kugelfisch » Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:41 am

If companies have no issue to run ads during TV programmes that are just as or more revolting, I don't see a reason to shy away from mukbangs on the internet.

Re: What is it about CA INs?

by rabidtictac » Sat Nov 21, 2020 4:02 pm

I haven't seen any indication of jewtube stopping the flow of shekels to the "kill yourself on camera slowly" crowd. It's not any less or more toxic than the other shit that modern pozzed companies endorse nowadays.

Re: What is it about CA INs?

by Guest » Sat Nov 21, 2020 3:22 pm

More likely because advertisers don't want their ads on gross disgusting mukbang shit.

Re: What is it about CA INs?

by VoiceOfReasonPast » Sat Nov 21, 2020 1:31 pm

Isn't Youtube trying to crack down on those landwhale mukbangers, since they're effectively getting paid to slowly an hero?

Re: What is it about CA INs?

by rabidtictac » Sat Nov 21, 2020 1:24 pm

CA and its affiliates used to be basically the only game in town. Every other lolcow was either CA or affiliated with CA in some way. That's why some of the most enduring lolcows are from that era of vidya and movie spergery. They built themselves a nice little nest over on BLIP BLIP BLIP. They insulated themselves from even well-meaning criticism. When it all came tumbling down tumbling down tumbling down, most of them either couldn't adapt or had to sell out to the teeny-bopper audience hardcore to stay popular. The latter group were the smart ones. Nowadays, all the rejects are left huddled together in a big pile of sour grapes, moaning about twitter pronouns and making trash videos nobody watches.

Most non-CA lolcows aren't enough of a trainwreck to bother with. Many are like Wings and just boring. Ex calladooty faggot who ripped off some other calladooty idiots and now plays rainbow six siege all day while halfheartedly begging. Yawn. Married some fat bitch. Yawn. Spends money on stupid shit. Yawn.

The only exterior lolcows I can think of who do funny things are the mukbang obeasts. Sometimes it's like watching a crackhead shoot up in real-time.

Re: What is it about CA INs?

by Guest » Sat Nov 21, 2020 12:43 pm

It made normies look up and take notice of what a terrible fucking weirdo he is. Anyone that obsessed with children's cartoons has a screw loose.

"I'm Jesus!"

Re: What is it about CA INs?

by CuckTurdginson » Sat Nov 21, 2020 11:28 am

That Pink Floyd review did more damage to Doge than CTC did.

Top