Movie Thread

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Movie Thread

Re: Movie Thread

by VoiceOfReasonPast » Mon Dec 09, 2019 6:12 pm

This is Current Year, mate. Everything needs to be grimdork and serial.
Tony Schiavone wrote:
Mon Dec 09, 2019 4:41 pm
The sequel gave us Vigo, a black man scared by a g-g-ghost train, and the Statue of Liberty walking through NY controlled by an NES Advantage. The soundtrack wasn't bad either.

All it all, it was a good thing.
Probably worse than the first one, but still pretty entertaining, if you ask me. Certainly had more soul than anything they'll shit out nowadays.

Re: Movie Thread

by Lindsay's Liver » Mon Dec 09, 2019 4:57 pm

Hey, it's "Ghostbusters", but it's also that "Goonies" remake that a few of you assholes out there have been wanting. Yay!

My first thought about the new trailer: It barely tries to sell the movie as a comedy, which is odd, to me. That's what "Ghostbusters" is! It's a comedy. It's a joke. It's not about the ghost shit; it's about a group of funny guys being funny. That's it. Even a boomer like me can see that.

My second thought: OH, I get it. They're trying to distance themselves from that bomb remake. They're countering its irreverence with extreme reverence. Because they think that the irreverance was why that film bombed. Not that it looked shitty in the trailer and was even more shitty if you bothered to see it (which I did, out of morbid curiosity).

My third thought: I was mildly curious about this movie yesterday, but now I don't give a shit.

Also, how did "Ghostbusters" ever get taken so seriously? I like the original movie, but I missed the cultural shift where that happened.

Re: Movie Thread

by Tony Schiavone » Mon Dec 09, 2019 4:41 pm

TheManWithNoPlan wrote:
Mon Dec 09, 2019 4:09 pm
Just give up Ghostbusters was decent film it never needed a sequel.
The sequel gave us Vigo, a black man scared by a g-g-ghost train, and the Statue of Liberty walking through NY controlled by an NES Advantage. The soundtrack wasn't bad either.

All it all, it was a good thing.

Re: Movie Thread

by TheManWithNoPlan » Mon Dec 09, 2019 4:09 pm

Just give up Ghostbusters was decent film it never needed a sequel.

Re: Movie Thread

by Guest » Mon Dec 09, 2019 4:03 pm

New Ghostbusters movie looks like it's trying to be a classic Spielbug movie. Which I guess is a step up from trying to be an Adam Sandler movie.

Re: Movie Thread

by Guest » Sun Dec 08, 2019 4:47 pm

VoiceOfReasonPast wrote:
Sun Dec 08, 2019 8:47 am
Kugelfisch wrote:
Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:27 am
A relationship they were absolutely in love with, being interracial and such. It was called "powerful" and all other kinds of gay shit. Suddenly it's not woke enough. Nig on Spic ass action needs to happen! Nothing else will do. It would be a Tuesday in US prison but groundbreaking for cinema.
Trying to appease the Left is a losing battle. It's never enough for them.

Interracial romance? Both are too thin.
Interracial romance with a landwhale? Too straight.
Interracial gay romance? Not polyamorous enough.
Interracial orgy? Why is nobody sodomized by a droid? And why is everyone so cisgender?
If you give a mouse a cookie...

Re: Movie Thread

by Keith Chegwin » Sun Dec 08, 2019 9:19 am

VoiceOfReasonPast wrote:
Sun Dec 08, 2019 8:47 am
Trying to appease the Left is a losing battle. It's never enough for them
The Unabomber tried to warn us

Re: Movie Thread

by VoiceOfReasonPast » Sun Dec 08, 2019 8:47 am

Kugelfisch wrote:
Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:27 am
A relationship they were absolutely in love with, being interracial and such. It was called "powerful" and all other kinds of gay shit. Suddenly it's not woke enough. Nig on Spic ass action needs to happen! Nothing else will do. It would be a Tuesday in US prison but groundbreaking for cinema.
Trying to appease the Left is a losing battle. It's never enough for them.

Interracial romance? Both are too thin.
Interracial romance with a landwhale? Too straight.
Interracial gay romance? Not polyamorous enough.
Interracial orgy? Why is nobody sodomized by a droid? And why is everyone so cisgender?

Re: Movie Thread

by TheManWithNoPlan » Sun Dec 08, 2019 7:16 am

Realistically he’d be all over Rey cause she got a fat ass. Thank you Disney for being too cowardly to do that though.

Re: Movie Thread

by Kugelfisch » Sun Dec 08, 2019 1:27 am

da PAC Nigguh wrote:
Sun Dec 08, 2019 12:06 am
They already forgot Finn started a relationship with Rose in their favorite SW film ever, they still expected him to fag out in Ep. 9.
A relationship they were absolutely in love with, being interracial and such. It was called "powerful" and all other kinds of gay shit. Suddenly it's not woke enough. Nig on Spic ass action needs to happen! Nothing else will do. It would be a Tuesday in US prison but groundbreaking for cinema.

Top