Why is Ruby Rose a thing?

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Why is Ruby Rose a thing?

Re: Why is Ruby Rose a thing?

by ban » Wed Aug 14, 2019 6:38 pm

VoiceOfReasonPast wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 4:13 pm
Could explain his greed :thinking:
SpoilerShow
Image
Geoff Jones clearly was a true visionary who saw what was in store for Hal Jewrdan :

Image

:lol:

Re: Why is Ruby Rose a thing?

by VoiceOfReasonPast » Wed Aug 14, 2019 4:13 pm

Could explain his greed :thinking:
SpoilerShow
Image

Re: Why is Ruby Rose a thing?

by ban » Wed Aug 14, 2019 11:17 am

It's the opposite. They came up with Batwoman and her niece to act as love interests for Batman and Robin and they would kiss them quite often as a reward and then came Batgirl after Batman and Robin were effectively de-homo'd.

Later(as in the 00s), they wanted a stronk, independent woman to be Batman's equal, so they re-imagined Cathy Kane into Bruce's cousin from his mother's side, as a pale, vampire-like feminist lesbian who was in a relationship with a female hispanic lesbian Gotham Detective. And she's jewish. Here's where shit really hits the fan :

Originally, her dad and mum were gonna be jewish but her dad was Bruce's mother's brother, so Bruce would also be jewish due to Martha. And the outrage was pretty big, so they changed it to only her mother being a chosen one. They unfortunately later somehow, made Hal Jordan jewish...which is some delicious irony, given that at some point, Hal Jordan was the Adolf Hitler of Green Lanterns, slept with a minor and GAS'd almost everyone in the universe. :lol:

Re: Why is Ruby Rose a thing?

by VoiceOfReasonPast » Sat May 25, 2019 3:30 pm

I know they came up with Batgirl to make this more hetero. Dunno about Batwoman. She was definitely part of making a complete "Bat Family".

Re: Why is Ruby Rose a thing?

by Guest » Sat May 25, 2019 3:03 pm

Reality wrote:
Fri May 24, 2019 10:36 pm
Christ fags? So libs and socialists still creating physco buzzwords that mean nothing. To sound edgy and more intelligent than they actually are. Not its not just christians but the majority populas. Whom are tired of lgbt/pc pandering inclusion in everything period. That makes everything that touches fail. The people at large have the right to express their opinions about their displeasure of " batdyke". Seeci can make crap up too. Had Dc not killed the chracter off in the late 80s. Which she was originally straight. She'd still be straight today and even more popular. Lgbt chracters dont sell get used to it. Plus the target audience is children, so certain things should be ommitted. If queers want queer chracters create your own. Queers are exactly 6 percent or of the entire populas and shrinking. Their a minority that should never be given credence or acknowledgment. Until its not a pc political agenda program. Being used to undermine freewill of the individual not tolerance. Inclusion kills imagination by restricting it with pc bs.
Wasn't Batwoman originally created as a love interest for Batman so people would stop claiming that Batman and Robin were gay?

Re: Why is Ruby Rose a thing?

by Reality » Fri May 24, 2019 10:36 pm

Christ fags? So libs and socialists still creating physco buzzwords that mean nothing. To sound edgy and more intelligent than they actually are. Not its not just christians but the majority populas. Whom are tired of lgbt/pc pandering inclusion in everything period. That makes everything that touches fail. The people at large have the right to express their opinions about their displeasure of " batdyke". Seeci can make crap up too. Had Dc not killed the chracter off in the late 80s. Which she was originally straight. She'd still be straight today and even more popular. Lgbt chracters dont sell get used to it. Plus the target audience is children, so certain things should be ommitted. If queers want queer chracters create your own. Queers are exactly 6 percent or of the entire populas and shrinking. Their a minority that should never be given credence or acknowledgment. Until its not a pc political agenda program. Being used to undermine freewill of the individual not tolerance. Inclusion kills imagination by restricting it with pc bs.

Re: Why is Ruby Rose a thing?

by Kugelfisch » Fri Aug 24, 2018 12:59 pm

Yet I can stand them less.

Re: Why is Ruby Rose a thing?

by veris leta facies » Thu Aug 23, 2018 9:33 pm

Guest wrote:
Sun Aug 19, 2018 9:33 pm
Half black/half white kids are uggo as fuck though.
Yup, but they're still better looking than african negroes. And more intelligent.

Re: Why is Ruby Rose a thing?

by Kugelfisch » Mon Aug 20, 2018 12:34 am

Guest wrote:
Sun Aug 19, 2018 7:05 am
Kugelfisch wrote:
Sat Aug 18, 2018 12:26 pm
Throwing a make believe fantasy far removed from reality into their faces of cute waifus only to make the realisation that such a thing doesn't exist even harder on them. Moe is nothing but cruelty.
Even if moe didn't exist it's not like herbivore men would stop fucking their pillows, or the universal revulsion towards women would somehow stop just because some drawings don't exist.
I don't think parading the utter fantasy of cute and likeable females in entertainment is doing any good for them either. They should be forced into labour to be worth a damn or culled.

Re: Why is Ruby Rose a thing?

by Guest » Sun Aug 19, 2018 9:33 pm

I dunno, Eurasian women tend to look pretty cute. Half black/half white kids are uggo as fuck though. Just nasty as hell. There's a commercial running right now where the mom and her little bastard mongrel are having some thought competition over food, ending with the uggy saying "I own you, Kathy." She looks like an albino African, white skin that still looks black, covered in nasty giant freckles with crinkled hair, dark eyes, and the broadest nose imaginable. In another time she would have been cast out in the desert for looking so damn ugly.

Top